Re: Here it is. The smoking gun.

alohacyberian <alohacyberian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Merlin Dorfman" <dorfman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:d92mqa$dnq$4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> alohacyberian <alohacyberian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> "Merlin Dorfman" <dorfman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:d8veqh$nqk$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> alohacyberian <alohacyberian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> "Merlin Dorfman" <dorfman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:d8sv3a$rli$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> alohacyberian <alohacyberian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Merlin Dorfman" <dorfman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:d8l1rk$8iv$5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>> alohacyberian <alohacyberian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Merlin Dorfman" <dorfman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:d8il06$fg1$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>> timagine@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>> The real reason the democrats are ****fting back and forth
about 
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> war
>>>>>>>>>>> is because Republicans won't help them get laws passed that
make
>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>> perverse lifestyles legal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    Why should a life style be illegal?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you suggesting that the lifestyles of, say, rapists, 
>>>>>>>>> wife-beaters
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> child-molesters should be legal? KM
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     I don't think that's what the OP meant by lifestyles.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So what do you mean by "lifestyles"? KM
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Lifestyles have the context of being unconventional, but
>>>>>> involving consenting adults.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Gee thanks for letting the world know that conventional people don't

>>>>> have
>>>>> "lifestyles". KM
>>>>
>>>>     To quote the OP, "Make their perverse lifestyles legal."
>>>> Conventional lifestyles don't need to be legalized.
>>>>
>>> There are thousands of unconventional lifestyles that don't need to be
>>> legalized. At first, I thought you merely lacked the use of a
dictionary.
>>> Now, I suspect it's a book on simple logic. KM
>>
>>     Do you believe that "perverse" lifestyles should be illegal,
>> as long as only consenting adults participate?
>>     And who gets to define "perverse"?
>>
> Should "perverse" lifestyles be illegal? It depends on the lifestyle.
And if 
> you don't know who gets to define "perverse" maybe we should end this 
> conversation to give you time to go elsewhere to promote your perverse 
> preferences. KM
 
     Explain why a perverse lifestyle that involves only consenting
adults should be illegal.
     Obviously, you think that you should be permitted to define--
not only for your own opinions but for purposes of legislation and
law enforcment--what is perverse and what is not.  I profoundly
disagree...nothing to do with you personally, I would disagree with
granting that power to anybody.
     Perfect example!  I disagree with you so you label my
"preferences" as perverse, without having a clue what they are.  And
I should give you the power to define and prohibit what you consider
to be perverse?  No thanks.