"Merlin Dorfman" <dorfman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:d97a6o$1nt$4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> alohacyberian <alohacyberian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Merlin Dorfman" <dorfman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:d92mqa$dnq$4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> alohacyberian <alohacyberian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> "Merlin Dorfman" <dorfman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:d8veqh$nqk$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> alohacyberian <alohacyberian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> "Merlin Dorfman" <dorfman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:d8sv3a$rli$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> alohacyberian <alohacyberian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Merlin Dorfman" <dorfman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:d8l1rk$8iv$5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>> alohacyberian <alohacyberian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Merlin Dorfman" <dorfman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:d8il06$fg1$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>> timagine@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> The real reason the democrats are ****fting back and forth
about
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> war
>>>>>>>>>>>> is because Republicans won't help them get laws passed that
make
>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>> perverse lifestyles legal.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why should a life style be illegal?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are you suggesting that the lifestyles of, say, rapists,
>>>>>>>>>> wife-beaters
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> child-molesters should be legal? KM
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't think that's what the OP meant by lifestyles.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So what do you mean by "lifestyles"? KM
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lifestyles have the context of being unconventional, but
>>>>>>> involving consenting adults.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gee thanks for letting the world know that conventional people
don't
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> "lifestyles". KM
>>>>>
>>>>> To quote the OP, "Make their perverse lifestyles legal."
>>>>> Conventional lifestyles don't need to be legalized.
>>>>>
>>>> There are thousands of unconventional lifestyles that don't need to
be
>>>> legalized. At first, I thought you merely lacked the use of a
>>>> dictionary.
>>>> Now, I suspect it's a book on simple logic. KM
>>>
>>> Do you believe that "perverse" lifestyles should be illegal,
>>> as long as only consenting adults participate?
>>> And who gets to define "perverse"?
>>>
>> Should "perverse" lifestyles be illegal? It depends on the lifestyle.
And
>> if
>> you don't know who gets to define "perverse" maybe we should end this
>> conversation to give you time to go elsewhere to promote your perverse
>> preferences. KM
>
> Explain why a perverse lifestyle that involves only consenting
> adults should be illegal.
> Obviously, you think that you should be permitted to define--
> not only for your own opinions but for purposes of legislation and
> law enforcment--what is perverse and what is not.
>
I didn't say that at all, nor did I even hint at it. You've created
something
out of thin air, falsely attributed it to me and then proceeded to argue
against your own lie, i.e. what you said and I never stated. Ya gotta love
it! Buh-bye now, Merlin. KM
--
(-:alohacyberian:-) At my website there are 3000 live cameras or
visit NASA, play games, read jokes, send greeting cards & connect
to CNN news, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards or learn all
about Hawaii, Israel and more: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/


|