Re: Here it is. The smoking gun.

alohacyberian <alohacyberian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

....

>>>>     Do you believe that "perverse" lifestyles should be illegal,
>>>> as long as only consenting adults participate?
>>>>     And who gets to define "perverse"?
>>>>
>>> Should "perverse" lifestyles be illegal? It depends on the lifestyle.
And 
>>> if
>>> you don't know who gets to define "perverse" maybe we should end this
>>> conversation to give you time to go elsewhere to promote your perverse
>>> preferences. KM
>>
>>     Explain why a perverse lifestyle that involves only consenting
>> adults should be illegal.
>>     Obviously, you think that you should be permitted to define--
>> not only for your own opinions but for purposes of legislation and
>> law enforcment--what is perverse and what is not.
>>
> I didn't say that at all, nor did I even hint at it. You've created
something 
> out of thin air, falsely attributed it to me and then proceeded to argue

> against your own lie, i.e. what you said and I never stated. Ya gotta
love 
> it! Buh-bye now, Merlin. KM

     You said, "if you don't know who gets to define 'perverse'
maybe we should end this conversation to give you time to go
elsewhere to promote your perverse preferences."
     Not a hint that you get to do the defining?  Pretty thinly
veiled, I think.
     And then you call it a "lie."

     I then wrote:
"Perfect example!  I disagree with you so you label my
'preferences' as perverse, without having a clue what they are."
which you did not respond to.  No wonder it's "buh-bye now."
     Hasta la vista, baby.  Or should it be "aloha."