Re: "Gilmore Girls" negotiations stall again

On Sun, 6 May 2007 16:38:41 +0000 (UTC), gazelle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Kenny McCormack) wrote:

>In article <2gur33hvlhghj17kkdk7e6mr8j2a37ja80@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>David  <dimlan17@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>...
>>I would argue that athletes are more im****tant to their s****t's
>>success than actors are to a movie's. People go see movies with
>>average actors but only want to watch the world's best athletes. If
>>NFL players go on strike people aren't going to watch scabs or turn to
>>arena football. 
>
>Funny.  I see it just the opposite.  Probably because I enjoy movies and
>TV and think s****ts are stupid

Well there's your problem right there.

>(though I certainly see the point that
>actors and athletes are doing the same thing - as one poster put it,
>"entertaining the m*****"), but it certainly seems to me that athletes
>are a lot more interchangeable than are actors.

The 700 major league baseball players aren't interchangeable with the
next best 700 players. That was proven very well the last time
baseball went on strike. But if the 700 best actors went on strike
Hollywood would keep on running.