In article <7tnc43hcqv4g7dgqpi5lejkbkque9n5pij@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Barnabas Collins <BarnabasCollinsonSF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Sat, 12 May 2007 20:49:02 +0000 (UTC),
>gazelle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Kenny McCormack) wrote:
>
>>I a) knew you would say that and b) knew the group still existed.
>>But, the last time I checked, which was, admitedly, quite a while ago,
>>it was all spam and noise. And it basically became that way shortly
>>after they stopped showing it on SciFi.
>Wrong again. I stil subscribe to it, there have been a number
>of posts today, none of it spam.
Faulty analysis by you. The truth of my statement is not at issue; it
is clearly correct as written (given the time-frame qualifiers). What
*is* possibly open to debate is whether the situation over there (in atds)
has changed, in the interim since I last checked it.
As it turns out, I just checked the group now, and found exactly 3
articles there (that is, on my server), all of them posted yesterday
(5/12/07) and none of them spam. They appear to be "fan-fiction" and
were in fact an enjoyable read. However, this situation suggests
strongly that, prior to yesterday, there was a drought.
|
