Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Amazing Race > Re: Bummer! (sp...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 20 Topic 7032 of 7099
Post > Topic >>

Re: Bummer! (spoiler)

by Michael Black <et472@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 13, 2008 at 12:54 PM

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, G wrote:

>
> "Ito****" <ito****@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:muj6f4d2edbucbt0psdibcr79bg1de4g42@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:16:41 -0400, "ricok987"
>> <ricok987@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>>> I knew the geeks were going home after the first 5 minutes of the
show-I
>>> even knew it was going to be due to a mental error.  The remark about
how
>>> they were mentally better by taking extra time to think over their
>>> gameplans-than the other teams was a dead giveaway.  I wished they
could
>>> have lasted a little longer, but to make a mistake like not reading
the
>>> entire clue is enexcuseable, and they deserved to go home.
>> 
>> They didn't lose because of that; they lost because the dude couldn't
>> do the wrestling task.
>
> I disagree, although it took him a long time to complete the task, he
did 
> complete it and they were able to get to the pit stop in the 8th
position, 
> but because they didn't read their clue they had the 30 minute penalty
and 
> that got them in the end. 
>
Of course, we don't know how much time was wasted with the team member
having to redo the wrestling task.

Had he zoomed through there in one try, the penalty likely wouldn't have
mattered.

So it's neither one or the other, but a combination.  They didn't read
the clue properly, they couldn't do the task rapidly, and thus they
are gone.

   Michael
 




 20 Posts in Topic:
Bummer! (spoiler)
"N.Bruges" <  2008-10-12 19:54:32 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
Kathy <kb222@[EMAIL PR  2008-10-12 22:40:41 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
Rich Piehl <rpiehl5REM  2008-10-12 22:45:18 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
bob36swmla@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-10-13 05:48:16 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
"Obveeus" <O  2008-10-13 08:58:23 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
Martin Phipps <martinp  2008-10-14 04:43:26 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
"Obveeus" <O  2008-10-14 09:04:15 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
"ricok987" <  2008-10-13 09:16:41 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
Itoshi <itoshi@[EMAIL   2008-10-13 08:43:57 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
"G" <juss4fu  2008-10-13 08:11:50 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
Itoshi <itoshi@[EMAIL   2008-10-13 10:48:04 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
"G" <juss4fu  2008-10-13 12:09:41 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
bob36swmla@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-10-14 08:52:02 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
David J Richardson <wo  2008-10-14 07:58:36 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
Loren Pechtel <lorenpe  2008-10-14 15:18:11 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
"ricok987" <  2008-10-13 12:12:36 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
Nancy2 <nancy-dooley@[  2008-10-13 09:16:47 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
Loren Pechtel <lorenpe  2008-10-13 09:55:17 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
Michael Black <et472@[  2008-10-13 12:54:11 
Re: Bummer! (spoiler)
Michael Black <et472@[  2008-10-13 12:56:50 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 0:58:57 CST 2008.