Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Adromeda > Re: [OT] The "g...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 27 Topic 1241 of 1295
Post > Topic >>

Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!

by whodunit <pillut_48@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 19, 2006 at 03:37 AM

James Craine wrote:
> 
> 
> John Baker wrote:
> 
>> In article <550-451FE1B1-6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>  Squibnick@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (The Emmerdale Iron Man) wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I was thinking about something in wrath of Khan that has always bugged
>>> me. When khan is monitoring kirk and spocks conversation between the
>>> enterprise and the genesis cave, and spock is giving kirk repair time
>>> estimates and says "If we go by the book captain, hours would seem
like
>>> days". Spock's inflection practically tells that they are talking in
>>> code. He explains it to Kirk over the open channel, for christ's sake!
>>> Kirk and Spock are always going on about what a genius khan is, and he
>>> was supposed to be a big general/ ruler back on Earth. Couldn't he
>>> figure out that Kirk and Spock would have some kind of protected
>>> communication mode or code? Kind of obvious and short sighted for such
a
>>> "genius", don't you think? 
>>
>>
>> Remember Khan ruled Earth in a time when we were barely space-capable, 
>> much less having a Starfleet with a rule book and so forth. Yeah, he 
>> could have made the assumption easily, but it just didn't occur to him 
>> - especially in mind of the glee he was feeling at (a) having just 
>> nicked the Genesis device and (b) having just buried Kirk under a 
>> couple of miles of dirt and rock. Or so he thought.
> 
> So why didn't we see him in 'Enterprise'?
> 
IIRC, the Botany Bay was launched in 1996, or 1999--many years before 
Enterprise is set.
 




 27 Posts in Topic:
[OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Squibnick@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2006-10-01 11:41:37 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
MarkRRose <MRosendorf@  2006-10-01 16:16:42 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Bob Kolker <nowhere@[E  2006-10-01 12:33:34 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
whodunit <pillut_48@[E  2006-10-04 04:43:35 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Bob Kolker <nowhere@[E  2006-10-04 10:35:40 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Mary McK <donaldmckerc  2006-10-04 23:00:32 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
whodunit <pillut_48@[E  2006-10-05 05:26:15 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
John Baker <forge@[EMA  2006-10-01 23:12:33 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
"Jette Goldie"   2006-10-02 16:29:47 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Exhibitionist <jaybo@[  2006-10-02 20:21:31 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
spike1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2006-10-03 08:35:59 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
"Billy No Mates"  2006-10-03 13:55:10 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Exhibitionist <jaybo@[  2006-10-03 16:53:52 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
spike1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2006-10-03 22:08:56 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
"Billy No Mates"  2006-10-04 00:17:12 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
James Craine <JamesCra  2006-10-19 02:38:53 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
whodunit <pillut_48@[E  2006-10-19 03:37:38 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
"EvilBill" <  2006-10-19 13:15:52 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
spike1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2006-10-19 12:24:21 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
"EvilBill" <  2006-10-19 14:05:49 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Tony <acvickers1NOSPAM  2006-10-20 18:08:18 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
spike1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2006-10-20 23:30:44 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
"Kevin" <kev  2006-10-01 20:49:45 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Tim McGaughy <teekem@[  2006-10-01 22:52:42 
Re: The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Stephen Fairchild <som  2006-10-02 06:42:50 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Exhibitionist <jaybo@[  2006-10-01 23:54:07 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
James Craine <JamesCra  2006-10-19 02:38:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 16:53:48 CDT 2008.