Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Adromeda > Re: [OT] The "g...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 21 of 27 Topic 1241 of 1292
Post > Topic >>

Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!

by Tony <acvickers1NOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 20, 2006 at 06:08 PM

EvilBill wrote:
> spike1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> EvilBill <quake2lives@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> did eloquently scribble:
>>> 1996, yeah - he states that to Chekov and Terrell early in the
>>> movie. (Oddly enough, he then contradicts himself by saying '200
>>> years ago' which would've meant 2085, but we can assume it was a
>>> slip of the tongue <g>)
>> Or more likely, they keep updating the timeline away from trek
>> original series to keep things more realistic.
>> :)
>> After all, we've not had the nuclear war they predicted either.
> 
> That's not supposed to happen till 2053, but given the current global 
> political situation, I'd say it's closer than that. <g>
> 
>> The
>> eugenics wars are nowhere to be seen,
> 
> Supposedly happened somewhat 'behind the scenes', so it could have been
a 
> secret war. LOL
> 
>> and cochrane's not going to be
>> able to invent warp drive in... whatever year he originally invented
>> it.
> 
> 2063? Well, he still might, after all he's not supposed to be born until

> 2030 ;)
> 
Didn't Voyager's little trip to Earth's past in the mid to late 90's 
kind of skew things a bit on the timeline with the introduction of 
futuristic technology? I know the Star Fleet Time Cops were involved in 
that episode as well - hmmm - foreshadowing of the tem****al stuff in 
Enterprise??????
 




 27 Posts in Topic:
[OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Squibnick@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2006-10-01 11:41:37 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
MarkRRose <MRosendorf@  2006-10-01 16:16:42 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Bob Kolker <nowhere@[E  2006-10-01 12:33:34 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
whodunit <pillut_48@[E  2006-10-04 04:43:35 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Bob Kolker <nowhere@[E  2006-10-04 10:35:40 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Mary McK <donaldmckerc  2006-10-04 23:00:32 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
whodunit <pillut_48@[E  2006-10-05 05:26:15 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
John Baker <forge@[EMA  2006-10-01 23:12:33 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
"Jette Goldie"   2006-10-02 16:29:47 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Exhibitionist <jaybo@[  2006-10-02 20:21:31 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
spike1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2006-10-03 08:35:59 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
"Billy No Mates"  2006-10-03 13:55:10 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Exhibitionist <jaybo@[  2006-10-03 16:53:52 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
spike1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2006-10-03 22:08:56 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
"Billy No Mates"  2006-10-04 00:17:12 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
James Craine <JamesCra  2006-10-19 02:38:53 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
whodunit <pillut_48@[E  2006-10-19 03:37:38 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
"EvilBill" <  2006-10-19 13:15:52 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
spike1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2006-10-19 12:24:21 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
"EvilBill" <  2006-10-19 14:05:49 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Tony <acvickers1NOSPAM  2006-10-20 18:08:18 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
spike1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2006-10-20 23:30:44 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
"Kevin" <kev  2006-10-01 20:49:45 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Tim McGaughy <teekem@[  2006-10-01 22:52:42 
Re: The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Stephen Fairchild <som  2006-10-02 06:42:50 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
Exhibitionist <jaybo@[  2006-10-01 23:54:07 
Re: [OT] The "genetically superior intellect", indeed!
James Craine <JamesCra  2006-10-19 02:38:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 16:51:12 CDT 2008.