Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition

Rob Kelk wrote:

> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 21:43:43 -0500, "Robo-man" <duffy12@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>><schoenfeld.one@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:963dff76-41ab-497e-b8e6-2bc8575af159@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
>>> By Herman Schoenfeld
>>
>>( unbeleavable stupid mindles drivell deleted )
>>
>>
>>You ignoramus!
>>
>> Its funny how the gov. had this incredibly planned 'Demolition' but was
>>UNABLE to 'plant' WMDs in Iraq.
> 
> YHBT.
> 
> Note that the rant was completely off-topic for all five of the groups
> it was posted to, and that none of the groups have anything to do with
> each other (excepting alt.os.linux.mandrake and comp.os.linux.misc) -
> this is a sure sign that the poster is posting in order to get
> responses...
> 
> Followups Set.
> 
It would help if he and the others would abandon Newspeak and use plain
American that I can translate into Strine.

Doug.