In article <l11pt3h0o4jr2b8gju9lvk0vh3hjj853nt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
True <yourkiddingright@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 02:19:34 GMT, JT's Ghost
> <justatroll@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >"Brian Smith" wrote:
> >
> >> This is very interesting. James tells Sharon that the DR was asking
him
> >> why
> >> he wasn't going after Matt. Did these DR session come before or after
> >> Chelsia told him about the Matt, Ryan, Baller conversation she spied
on.
> >> Chelsia made it clear to him that Ryan would stab him in the back.
> >>
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DLv2WwuNUg
> >>
> >
> >Interesting indeed... And here *I* thought that the outcome of BB
is/was
> >determined by the HG's themselves, without undo influence by the
> >production staff. Silly me...the HG's are real, the outcome is
> >predetermined, just like pro-wrestling. ;-)
> >
> > - JT
> >gotta love plot twists...
> Predetermined? No way, too many variables each week for them to be
> that precise. Guided here and there? ...sure.
> James never said he was told to put Matt up, or even that it was
> suggested he do so, I believe he eluded that 'one'(possibly more, but
> DR sessions can contain a lot of questions, covering a lot of topics
> and/or HG's) question simply asked 'why' he wasn't going after Matt,
> not that he 'should' go after Matt.
> The DR might of(ooops, I mean 'have') simply been trying to get
> footage for the network show, that had him stating why he wasn't going
> after Matt. They might of felt that for those viewers that needed
> clarifcation. Perhaps they were fully expecting James to say "Well, I
> promised Nat".
> I see no huge conspiracy here, but I can see how 'some' in this NG
> might read a whole lot more into this.
>
Sorry, I was just trying for a little sarcastic humor...
- JT
will start labeling
--
Email Address is used to collect Spam!!!
"The pendulum of the mind oscillates between sense and nonsense,
not between right and wrong." - Carl Jung
|
