Re: Let the public have one vote

madams53 wrote:
> "s0183616" <s0183616@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:KSUHj.404$Gq7.223@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> riwybable@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>> Let the public have one vote and let it be Nat that is voted out.
America 
>>> and the world doesn't like you Nat.
>> I disagree.  You let the public vote, you kill the strategy aspect.
>>
>> Although I don't think there's a lot of great strategy going on in this

>> season.
> 
> 
> Besides," letting America vote" would just make it easier for Grodner to

> manipulate the outcome. After all, voting who went back in went exactly
like 
> we wanted, right?

Not like I wanted.  I wanted Allison back in the house.