<doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:22485-4809E885-335@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> alooo asked:
>
> "is there anybody here who takes issues with the validity of one of
> those answers but not the other?"
>
> Oooh...me, me, me, me, me.
>
> The GP question seemed legit but sneaky
Wow, I couldn't be more diametrically opposed! The GP question was a
total
farce.
The teacup question was sneaky but fair- how much liquid can the teacup
hold? They didn't ask how much liquid can the teacup hold if there were
an
imaginary door that isn't there now?
>
> The teacup question seemed unclear.
The teacup question was sneaky, but perfectly clear.
The 'pre-existing' relation****p question was ****.
>
> What if a HG yelled out..."You mean the entire cup or just the part
> below the big door opening?"
>
> Then...Julie would have had to clarify it.
No, she would've been obligated to answer "Answers, please."
>
> Maybe same with the GP's.
No. If a HG had said, "Julie, do you mean the loosest term of
'relation****p, as in pool to water, washer to dryer, etc, or do you mean
people?
No, she would've been obligated to answer "Answers, please."
>
> If Sharon (or anyone) had yelled out..."Do the GP count, or just
> HG?"..Julie would ALSO have had to clarify.
No- "Answers please."
|
