On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 03:09:31 -0700, "alooo" <uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> offered us
these thoughts:
>
><Chaldean> wrote
>> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:51:37 -0700, "alooo" <uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> offered us
>> these thoughts:
>>
>>>
>>><Chaldean> wrote
>>>> Responding to "I guess they did not let real questions through. Like
>>>> the GP answer from HOH or 9 gallon tea cup." someone wrote "NO, they
>>>> didn't. I was on with that question, and my call suspiciously got
>>>> dropped... twice."
>>>
>>>
>>>Maybe she just didn't want to take calls from idiots. I can't blame
her.
>>
>> I'm not sure who your "she" is here. Allison G. didn't manage the
>> phone while on-air, and the host was Bunky. Did you mean Gretchen,
>> who usually punches the phone buttons, but was off today?
>
>
>I was talking about AG. She's got the power to tell the screener who she
>does or doesn't want to take calls from.
If so, she did it prior to the show, hence prior to the calls and so
prior to knowing whether caller A is or is not an idiot. I agree that
she is the most likely reason such calls were screened, but I don't
agree that *all* such callers would be idiots. {I suspect AG wouldn't
agree, either.} Given the mess about the question here, the most
legitimate reason dodging the subject on HC would be, there isn't time
to get into it adequately. But in saying this, I'm being far more
generous to AG than is my actual estimate of her integrity. As well,
I suspect she isn't bright enough to see the significant difference
between the teacup question and the gerbil question. {I get really
bored with the words "guinea pigs."}
--
Bob
|
