In article <h56k04hkb2qeljf0iq4epjvrgit6isfcfj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
lcraver@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:04:02 -0700, "Buckaroo Banzai"
> <blisteringlogic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"alooo" <uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >news:chjOj.2255$I55.362@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> There's been a lot of discussion comparing the GP question with last
> >> season's teacup question and I think I'm seeing a pattern here so let
me
> >> ask something: is there anybody here who takes issues with the
validity of
> >> one of those answers but not the other?
> >
> >I got screwed by the teacup question, but that was a fair trick
question-
> >all the facts were available to me, I just missed them. The Guinea Pig
> >question was a complete cheat. PERIOD. Now, before you guys cry about
the
> >relation****p 'facts'. If the question had been asked, and then each
> >'houseguest pair', including the guinea pigs had been available for the
HG's
> >to view, and they missed it, I'd say too bad houseguests. BB cheated
the
> >HG's.
>
> While I agree, it's a hoot that the victim was Sharon who has had far
> more of a 'relation****p' with the guinea pigs than anyone else in the
> house. From the point of view of the GPs she's their food source -
> when did anyone else feed them?
Nat was always doing it whenever she needed some attention.
Apparently yelling "beebeees!" gets everyone to look at you.
--
Cranial Crusader dgh 1138 at bell south point net
|
