"queenie" <queenie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:rflk049hk8nljfqm8fqn67a60g0olurav9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:37:28 GMT, "Brian Smith"
> <dcg_brian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>And if watched late last night there was more talk of keeping Sharon and
>>getting rid of Sheila.
>
> That makes no sense. Why would they want to keep Sharon--the one
> everybody seems to like? Maybe AG told them to say that so the
> voyeurs would foam at the mouth and spread the word.
What you said makes no sense. If past alliances are strong then keeping
Sharon makes a lot of sense. She would presumably get three votes: James,
Josh and Chelsia. Ryan, for example, would get votes from Baller, Sheila,
Nat and Matt. Sharon's competition record isn't the greatest and Sheila
proved she can do endurance comps. Why give Sheila an advantage in the
final
HOH?
Brian
|
