Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Big Brother > Re: GP Teacup P...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 27 of 52 Topic 10839 of 11089
Post > Topic >>

Re: GP Teacup Party

by Chaldean Apr 19, 2008 at 04:28 PM

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:00:17 GMT, "Brian Smith"
<dcg_brian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> offered us these thoughts:

><Chaldean> wrote in message 
>news:1t8k04p7pj1evd0qd3ltgsd3gi2v0gloma@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:51:53 -0700, "alooo" <uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> offered us
>> these thoughts:
>>
>>>There's been a lot of discussion comparing the GP question with last
>>>season's teacup question and I think I'm seeing a pattern here so let
me 
>>>ask
>>>something: is there anybody here who takes issues with the validity of
one
>>>of those answers but not the other?
>>
>> I believe you already know, I found the teacup question fine, but feel
>> the GP question is, at the very kindest, a cheap shot.
>
>Even if you found the teacup question fine it still sucks that the DR
helped 
>Jen out on that question. She's essentially admitted that was the case
and 
>it kept her in the game a lot longer than she deserved to be. Without
help 
>she more than likely would have put down a much larger number and Dustin 
>probably would have won or whom ever had the next lowest amount written 
>down.
>
>I will give BB credit for at least telling us the correct answer based on

>their definition of the teacup. After that competition and a lot of 
>disbelief, Joe went and took water from the pool and the bottom of the 
>teacup did indeed hold 9 gallons.
>
>Brian 

Helping out a *single* contestant with a question is a whole other
matter than whether or not the question itself is legitimate.  I can
think of no conditions under which such assistance could be kosher.

The evidence for or against such contest-tampering apparently is not
very definitive.  If it was, there would be no controversy about the
matter -- as there is year in and year out. <s>

But the fact that BB's answer to its teacup question was right doesn't
surprise me in the least -- with or without non-kosher tampering. When
something can be established as a fact, or not, with the evidence
easily going out to the world at large, would anyone dumb enough to
give out a wrong answer last long enough at CBS to get that answer
live to Julie?  And could I put it in a more clumsy way? <s>

--
Bob
 




 52 Posts in Topic:
GP Teacup Party
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-19 02:51:53 
Re: GP Teacup Party
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-19 07:41:41 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"Buckaroo Banzai&quo  2008-04-19 08:09:53 
Re: GP Teacup Party
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-19 14:33:03 
Re: GP Teacup Party
UCLAN <nomail@[EMAIL P  2008-04-19 11:57:43 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Chaldean   2008-04-19 12:29:51 
Re: GP Teacup Party
UCLAN <nomail@[EMAIL P  2008-04-19 22:12:38 
Re: GP Teacup Party
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-19 14:48:06 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Chaldean   2008-04-19 12:34:34 
Re: GP Teacup Party
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-19 18:54:21 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Chaldean   2008-04-19 17:16:38 
Re: GP Teacup Party
UCLAN <nomail@[EMAIL P  2008-04-19 22:17:21 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"Buckaroo Banzai&quo  2008-04-19 07:04:02 
Re: GP Teacup Party
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-19 16:08:31 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-19 13:33:40 
Re: GP Teacup Party
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-19 21:18:59 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-19 21:37:05 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-19 09:04:38 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"Buckaroo Banzai&quo  2008-04-19 13:50:35 
Re: GP Teacup Party
ringo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-19 16:46:24 
Re: GP Teacup Party
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-19 21:20:54 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Kate <weller_4@[EMAIL   2008-04-19 16:52:02 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-20 02:28:31 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Chaldean   2008-04-19 10:27:08 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Chaldean   2008-04-19 10:37:48 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-19 23:00:17 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Chaldean   2008-04-19 16:28:47 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-19 13:41:49 
Re: GP Teacup Party
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-19 14:41:08 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-20 02:23:28 
Re: GP Teacup Party
GeeWhizz <schutter5@[E  2008-04-19 19:19:25 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-20 00:32:02 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"madams53" <  2008-04-20 01:09:58 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-20 00:27:40 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Kate <weller_4@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 00:56:46 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-20 02:45:03 
Re: GP Teacup Party
UCLAN <nomail@[EMAIL P  2008-04-20 11:53:34 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Kate <weller_4@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 16:14:54 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-21 02:43:05 
Re: GP Teacup Party
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-21 07:53:48 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Chaldean   2008-04-21 12:45:18 
Re: GP Teacup Party
UCLAN <nomail@[EMAIL P  2008-04-20 11:48:17 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Kate <weller_4@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 16:19:37 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Chaldean   2008-04-20 16:41:37 
Re: GP Teacup Party
UCLAN <nomail@[EMAIL P  2008-04-20 21:51:47 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-21 01:38:57 
Re: GP Teacup Party
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-20 07:28:21 
Re: GP Teacup Party
Chaldean   2008-04-20 10:26:04 
Re: GP Teacup Party
UCLAN <nomail@[EMAIL P  2008-04-20 11:59:25 
Re: GP Teacup Party
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-20 21:22:21 
Re: GP Teacup Party
UCLAN <nomail@[EMAIL P  2008-04-20 21:43:13 
Re: GP Teacup Party
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-21 04:53:48 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 1:33:23 CDT 2008.