On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 00:27:40 -0700, "alooo" <uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"madams53" <madams53@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>
>> "alooo" <uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>> I know I've been a little harsh against the people who don't get these
>>> questions but perhaps it's one of those situations where some people
got
>>> the "broad interpretation" gene while others got the "pat their head
>>> while rubbing their stomach" gene. And the people who immediately
>>> attribute something they don't understand to rigging got the "nutjob,
>>> whacko, can't-deal-with-reality-so-they-grab-onto-a-conspiracy-theory"
>>> gene.
>>
>>
>> Gee, I'm sooo glad you decided not to be harsh any more!! ;)
>
>I said I've been a little harsh with the people who don't get these
>questions. It's impossible to be too harsh with the conspiracy freaks.
>
And yet you manage to insult them every time you mention them. It was
a trick question, but low-down because it came at such a crucial time
in an im****tant competition and it *did* change the direction and the
outcome. If you can't see why people are a little upset about that
you're not looking at all sides. Instead you call us conspiracy
freaks or idiots because we have a different point of view. Still,
all things considered, this has been a pretty civil group this season.
|
