by "alooo" <uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Apr 20, 2008 at 02:45 AM
"Kate" <weller_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>I said I've been a little harsh with the people who don't get these
>>questions. It's impossible to be too harsh with the conspiracy freaks.
>>
> And yet you manage to insult them every time you mention them. It was
> a trick question, but low-down because it came at such a crucial time
> in an im****tant competition and it *did* change the direction and the
> outcome. If you can't see why people are a little upset about that
> you're not looking at all sides. Instead you call us conspiracy
> freaks or idiots because we have a different point of view.
No, I rail on the conspiracy freaks because they have no proof. They're
accusing BB of having the incorrect answer on the card ("fiction") and
then
changing it to the correct answer ("fact") in order to benefit one player.
I
don't see why it's so hard to believe they planned to give the correct
answer all along.
