by UCLAN <nomail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Apr 20, 2008 at 11:53 AM
alooo wrote:
>>And yet you manage to insult them every time you mention them. It was
>>a trick question, but low-down because it came at such a crucial time
>>in an im****tant competition and it *did* change the direction and the
>>outcome. If you can't see why people are a little upset about that
>>you're not looking at all sides. Instead you call us conspiracy
>>freaks or idiots because we have a different point of view.
>
> No, I rail on the conspiracy freaks because they have no proof. They're
> accusing BB of having the incorrect answer on the card ("fiction") and
then
> changing it to the correct answer ("fact") in order to benefit one
player. I
> don't see why it's so hard to believe they planned to give the correct
> answer all along.
What kills the conspiracy theory is that there was a 50% chance that the
players would give the same answer. The conspirators would never settle
on a plan with only a 50% chance of success.
--
Raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens.
