"Kate" <weller_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>But I would still wonder how
> on earth they expected anybody to get that answer from what they know
> about the other houseguests. They still haven't figured it out three
> days later.
Then that says something about their ability to process information or at
least their recollection of what the information was. Julie said the
answer
was "fact," so if they're only thinking in terms of human relation****ps
that
means at least one participant in that challenge has a preexisting
relation****p with someone else still in the game. Either that person isn't
aware of the preexisting relation****p (a la Cowboy and ****omis), in which
case they were all on equal footing, or that person definitively knew the
answer to the question and not everybody did. That would be such obvious
rigging on BB's part that it's pretty safe for them to assume that's not
the
case. So they should have come to the logical conclusion that if two of
them
have a preexisting relation****p, the only one who might be aware of it is
Sheila (who wasn't in the comp).
As I mentioned elsewhere, the HG's are reviewing that question as they
remember it, which isn't precise. Perhaps if it was written down for them
they would have figured out possibilities that make the "fact" answer
correct beyond humans.
|
