by "alooo" <uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Apr 21, 2008 at 02:43 AM
"Kate" <weller_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>No, I rail on the conspiracy freaks because they have no proof. They're
>>accusing BB of having the incorrect answer on the card ("fiction") and
>>then
>>changing it to the correct answer ("fact") in order to benefit one
player.
>>I
>>don't see why it's so hard to believe they planned to give the correct
>>answer all along.
>>
> Fair enough. Both sides have a point and neither side has proof.
This is an issue where there's a correct answer and an incorrect answer-
what happened during the pause is irrelevant since the correct answer was
revealed. If the question was "Sheila is 46" it wouldn't matter what the
card said or whether it was changed, the correct answer would always be
"fact." The burden of proof is on anybody who disagrees with that answer,
not the ones who do.
>I'm
> just saying it's not really necessary to call people names to get your
> point across.
And people shouldn't accuse others of rigging simply because they don't
understand a question. I don't open with the name calling, it's a response
to other people's negative behavior. Take that away and I have no reason
to
call them whackos and nutjobs.
