Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Big Brother > Re: Spoiler--Do...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 16 of 38 Topic 10852 of 10918
Post > Topic >>

Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)

by "alooo" <uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 22, 2008 at 02:48 AM

"Brian Smith" <dcg_brian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>> She didn't answer every other question correctly. She got the one about

>> the toy in the GP cage wrong. If you want to look at the relationship 
>> question as a guessing question, fine, it was a guessing question just 
>> like all the others were. She still had a 50% chance to get it right
and 
>> she didn't. Then in the tiebreaker, Ryan gave an answer that was off by

>> four hours. That should have been easy for her to beat but instead she 
>> was off by about eight hours. Sharon lost because of Sharon.
>
> They all got the GP toy question wrong but BB could have been "creative"

> with that one as well in terms of the answer. The rest of the questions 
> were all verifiable by us and by the HGs. They could easily ask James
and 
> Chelsia if they fought, Jacob receiving the fewest votes makes perfect 
> sense, we know Amanda didn't fake her illness, etc. The GP questions
were 
> not verifiable, especially the toy question. So I wouldn't say Sharon
lost 
> because of Sharon. She lost because of questions that had next to
nothing 
> to do with the game.

And how exactly would you verify the number of votes Jacob got? You can't 
count them yourself, you have to take the word of those who counted them, 
who may not be from an indepent accounting firm. We don't even know for
sure 
that Amanda's illness was real since she was handled by a BB medic. For
all 
we know, Amanda might have been a shill to drum up a little drama and that

fainting was all staged. Hell, it didn't even look real. A case could be 
made that all those answers were made up on the fly but at a certain point

common sense has to kick in. Judging by the posts in here, Sharon is a lot

more popular than Ryan. Not only do people love the underdog, but viewers 
are more satisfied when their favorite wins so what's the incentive for BB

to fix the game in Ryan's favor? Why not fix it in Adam's favor? Ryan is 
boring and from a tv executive's perspective he was probably the least 
appealing choice to win this HOH.




 38 Posts in Topic:
Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:15:39 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:17:28 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
kat <sixkats@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-21 22:28:07 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"michael" <d  2008-04-21 22:37:44 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"are you kidding&quo  2008-04-22 05:43:26 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"are you kidding&quo  2008-04-22 05:41:07 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:58:22 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"are you kidding&quo  2008-04-22 06:49:13 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 10:55:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Chaldean   2008-04-22 10:11:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
kat <sixkats@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-21 22:47:25 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-22 00:43:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 06:09:26 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 00:40:41 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 08:18:10 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 02:48:46 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 19:19:08 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 17:28:51 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-22 19:58:56 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-23 05:33:08 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-23 02:53:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-23 06:00:22 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-23 14:56:35 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 10:34:36 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-24 06:33:24 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-24 07:24:54 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-24 11:38:21 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-23 15:03:34 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 10:38:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
D-W <D_Dubya@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-23 10:39:20 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 13:40:18 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-23 19:34:20 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Haggardly Defiance&  2008-04-22 11:24:25 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 19:08:29 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 17:27:20 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
JT's Ghost <justatroll  2008-04-22 12:04:31 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Chaldean   2008-04-21 22:47:29 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:53:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri May 16 21:17:35 CDT 2008.