Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)

"Brian Smith" <dcg_brian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:6bhPj.211554$pM4.21999@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "alooo" <uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:wEgPj.21220$%41.12606@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "Brian Smith" <dcg_brian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>> "Dale Hicks" <dgh1138@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> So we see things worked out exactly like they would have if they
>>>> hadn't screwed Sharon out of her HOH.
>>>>
>>>> All I want is for Ryan to lose since he kept the other alliance in
>>>> the house.  There's no way Baller will take him.  Shiela should, but
>>>> she's insane, so she'll probably stick with her alliance.
>>>>
>>>> And for Sharon to take Allison down for a few hundred grand.
>>>
>>> Sharon, was screwed plain and simple. She was answering every "game" 
>>> related question they asked and probably would have gotten another one

>>> correct as well.
>>
>>
>> She didn't answer every other question correctly. She got the one about

>> the toy in the GP cage wrong. If you want to look at the relationship 
>> question as a guessing question, fine, it was a guessing question just 
>> like all the others were. She still had a 50% chance to get it right
and 
>> she didn't. Then in the tiebreaker, Ryan gave an answer that was off by

>> four hours. That should have been easy for her to beat but instead she 
>> was off by about eight hours. Sharon lost because of Sharon.
>
> They all got the GP toy question wrong but BB could have been "creative"

> with that one as well in terms of the answer. The rest of the questions 
> were all verifiable by us and by the HGs. They could easily ask James
and 
> Chelsia if they fought, Jacob receiving the fewest votes makes perfect 
> sense, we know Amanda didn't fake her illness, etc. The GP questions
were 
> not verifiable, especially the toy question. So I wouldn't say Sharon
lost 
> because of Sharon. She lost because of questions that had next to
nothing 
> to do with the game. By the way, Ryan's answer was off by a lot more
than 
> 4 hours. He answered 310 and the answer was 557.
>
> Brian
>

a lot more than 4 hours? he was off by 247 minutes.
4 hours=240 minutes. 247-240= 7 minutes.
Wow, that is a lot more than 4 hours! 7 whole minutes!
You stupid. Are you a Sharon fan?, that would explain it.