Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Big Brother > Re: Spoiler--Do...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 38 Topic 10852 of 10918
Post > Topic >>

Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)

by "Brian Smith" <dcg_brian@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 22, 2008 at 07:19 PM

"alooo" <uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:iwiPj.8272$GE1.1256@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Brian Smith" <dcg_brian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>> She didn't answer every other question correctly. She got the one
about 
>>> the toy in the GP cage wrong. If you want to look at the relationship 
>>> question as a guessing question, fine, it was a guessing question just

>>> like all the others were. She still had a 50% chance to get it right
and 
>>> she didn't. Then in the tiebreaker, Ryan gave an answer that was off
by 
>>> four hours. That should have been easy for her to beat but instead she

>>> was off by about eight hours. Sharon lost because of Sharon.
>>
>> They all got the GP toy question wrong but BB could have been
"creative" 
>> with that one as well in terms of the answer. The rest of the questions

>> were all verifiable by us and by the HGs. They could easily ask James
and 
>> Chelsia if they fought, Jacob receiving the fewest votes makes perfect 
>> sense, we know Amanda didn't fake her illness, etc. The GP questions
were 
>> not verifiable, especially the toy question. So I wouldn't say Sharon 
>> lost because of Sharon. She lost because of questions that had next to 
>> nothing to do with the game.
>
> And how exactly would you verify the number of votes Jacob got? You
can't 
> count them yourself, you have to take the word of those who counted
them, 
> who may not be from an indepent accounting firm. We don't even know for 
> sure that Amanda's illness was real since she was handled by a BB medic.

> For all we know, Amanda might have been a shill to drum up a little
drama 
> and that fainting was all staged. Hell, it didn't even look real. A case

> could be made that all those answers were made up on the fly but at a 
> certain point common sense has to kick in. Judging by the posts in here,

> Sharon is a lot more popular than Ryan. Not only do people love the 
> underdog, but viewers are more satisfied when their favorite wins so 
> what's the incentive for BB to fix the game in Ryan's favor? Why not fix

> it in Adam's favor? Ryan is boring and from a tv executive's perspective

> he was probably the least appealing choice to win this HOH.

Jacob: He was only in the house for about 3 days and got very little TV 
time. Sharon made him seem like a complete idiot all season so given those

facts know one would question him getting the fewest votes.

Amanda: Are you serious? You clearly did not watch the feeds. What do you 
mean it didn't look real? Are you a doctor? And what do you mean by BB 
medic? The fire department and paramedics from the city or county came to 
the house and took her and Alli to the hospital. The "BB person" was a 
nurse. Both Amanda and Alli saw a doctor that came to the BB house during 
the week after their incidents that weekend.

Popularity: Sharon might be more popular in this NG but if you go to other

forums she seems to have a lot of haters. The producers appear to like 
Sheila the most and letting Sharon win that HOH would have been very bad
for 
her.

Like I said before, the other questions are easily verifiable just by
asking 
the other HGs. The GP questions were stupid and trick questions. If you 
think they weren't then we'll just have to disagree.

Brian




 38 Posts in Topic:
Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:15:39 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:17:28 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
kat <sixkats@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-21 22:28:07 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"michael" <d  2008-04-21 22:37:44 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"are you kidding&quo  2008-04-22 05:43:26 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"are you kidding&quo  2008-04-22 05:41:07 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:58:22 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"are you kidding&quo  2008-04-22 06:49:13 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 10:55:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Chaldean   2008-04-22 10:11:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
kat <sixkats@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-21 22:47:25 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-22 00:43:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 06:09:26 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 00:40:41 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 08:18:10 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 02:48:46 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 19:19:08 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 17:28:51 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-22 19:58:56 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-23 05:33:08 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-23 02:53:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-23 06:00:22 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-23 14:56:35 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 10:34:36 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-24 06:33:24 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-24 07:24:54 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-24 11:38:21 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-23 15:03:34 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 10:38:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
D-W <D_Dubya@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-23 10:39:20 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 13:40:18 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-23 19:34:20 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Haggardly Defiance&  2008-04-22 11:24:25 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 19:08:29 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 17:27:20 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
JT's Ghost <justatroll  2008-04-22 12:04:31 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Chaldean   2008-04-21 22:47:29 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:53:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri May 16 21:47:09 CDT 2008.