Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Big Brother > Re: Spoiler--Do...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 18 of 38 Topic 10852 of 10918
Post > Topic >>

Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)

by "alooo" <uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 22, 2008 at 05:28 PM

"Brian Smith" <dcg_brian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> Jacob: He was only in the house for about 3 days and got very little TV 
> time. Sharon made him seem like a complete idiot all season so given
those 
> facts know one would question him getting the fewest votes.
>
> Amanda: Are you serious? You clearly did not watch the feeds. What do
you 
> mean it didn't look real? Are you a doctor? And what do you mean by BB 
> medic? The fire department and paramedics from the city or county came
to 
> the house and took her and Alli to the hospital. The "BB person" was a 
> nurse. Both Amanda and Alli saw a doctor that came to the BB house
during 
> the week after their incidents that weekend.
>
> Popularity: Sharon might be more popular in this NG but if you go to
other 
> forums she seems to have a lot of haters. The producers appear to like 
> Sheila the most and letting Sharon win that HOH would have been very bad

> for her.
>
> Like I said before, the other questions are easily verifiable just by 
> asking the other HGs. The GP questions were stupid and trick questions.
If 
> you think they weren't then we'll just have to disagree.


You need to look up the word "verifiable" in the dictionary. NONE of those

are verifiable by the viewers, not even Amanda's medical records unless
she 
chooses to disclose them. They're all just assumptions. The questions 
regarding the jury house will never be verifiable, we'll simply have to
take 
the word of those who were present there. And of course I wasn't being 
serious about the validity of the other questions, I was making the point 
that the GP question was verifiable to many (maybe even most) viewers 
because it had a tangible answer whereas the others didn't. So as crazy as

those theories may be, they're no crazier than the GP answer switch
theory.

As for your argument that Sharon winning HOH would have been bad for
Sheila, 
all that would have meant was Sharon would be in the F3. I don't think it 
would have hurt Sheila's chances of making it to F2 but I do think Sheila 
would have a better shot against Sharon than against Adam so keeping
Sharon 
instead would have been to her advantage.




 38 Posts in Topic:
Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:15:39 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:17:28 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
kat <sixkats@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-21 22:28:07 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"michael" <d  2008-04-21 22:37:44 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"are you kidding&quo  2008-04-22 05:43:26 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"are you kidding&quo  2008-04-22 05:41:07 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:58:22 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"are you kidding&quo  2008-04-22 06:49:13 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 10:55:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Chaldean   2008-04-22 10:11:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
kat <sixkats@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-21 22:47:25 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-22 00:43:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 06:09:26 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 00:40:41 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 08:18:10 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 02:48:46 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 19:19:08 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 17:28:51 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-22 19:58:56 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-23 05:33:08 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-23 02:53:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-23 06:00:22 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-23 14:56:35 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 10:34:36 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-24 06:33:24 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-24 07:24:54 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-24 11:38:21 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-23 15:03:34 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 10:38:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
D-W <D_Dubya@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-23 10:39:20 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 13:40:18 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-23 19:34:20 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Haggardly Defiance&  2008-04-22 11:24:25 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 19:08:29 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 17:27:20 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
JT's Ghost <justatroll  2008-04-22 12:04:31 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Chaldean   2008-04-21 22:47:29 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:53:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri May 16 21:55:08 CDT 2008.