Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)

In article <opvPj.10436$2g1.3335@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
says...
> 
> "Brian Smith" <dcg_brian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >
> > Popularity: Sharon might be more popular in this NG but if you go to
other 
> > forums she seems to have a lot of haters. The producers appear to like

> > Sheila the most and letting Sharon win that HOH would have been very
bad 
> > for her.

I imagine on TV-only watchers she's seen as a floater.  And she 
really has no story without Jacob.  Shiela has the single-mom thing, 
Ryan has the girlfriend to marry after the show thing, Baller has the 
"jerk with a heart of gold" thing.  And she hasn't won a competition 
in weeks, so she's below the radar there.

Jacob's so dun there's nothing really to work with, at least from 
what I can tell.

> > Like I said before, the other questions are easily verifiable just by 
> > asking the other HGs. The GP questions were stupid and trick
questions. If 
> > you think they weren't then we'll just have to disagree.
> 
> You need to look up the word "verifiable" in the dictionary. NONE of
those 
> are verifiable by the viewers, not even Amanda's medical records unless
she 
> chooses to disclose them. They're all just assumptions. The questions 
> regarding the jury house will never be verifiable, we'll simply have to
take 
> the word of those who were present there.

Depends on your level of paranoia.  I feel that TV producers writing 
a TV show to set up a more favorable result is possible.  I'm not as 
fine with the idea that BB set up a pet store website featuring the 
chew toy with a nut inside it, nor with the idea that Amanda 
continues to act for the chat cameras.

-- 
Cranial Crusader              dgh 1138 at bell south point net