Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Big Brother > Re: Spoiler--Do...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 21 of 38 Topic 10852 of 10918
Post > Topic >>

Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)

by "Brian Smith" <dcg_brian@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 23, 2008 at 02:53 AM

"alooo" <uh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:opvPj.10436$2g1.3335@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Brian Smith" <dcg_brian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>> Jacob: He was only in the house for about 3 days and got very little TV

>> time. Sharon made him seem like a complete idiot all season so given 
>> those facts know one would question him getting the fewest votes.
>>
>> Amanda: Are you serious? You clearly did not watch the feeds. What do
you 
>> mean it didn't look real? Are you a doctor? And what do you mean by BB 
>> medic? The fire department and paramedics from the city or county came
to 
>> the house and took her and Alli to the hospital. The "BB person" was a 
>> nurse. Both Amanda and Alli saw a doctor that came to the BB house
during 
>> the week after their incidents that weekend.
>>
>> Popularity: Sharon might be more popular in this NG but if you go to 
>> other forums she seems to have a lot of haters. The producers appear to

>> like Sheila the most and letting Sharon win that HOH would have been
very 
>> bad for her.
>>
>> Like I said before, the other questions are easily verifiable just by 
>> asking the other HGs. The GP questions were stupid and trick questions.

>> If you think they weren't then we'll just have to disagree.
>
>
> You need to look up the word "verifiable" in the dictionary. NONE of
those 
> are verifiable by the viewers, not even Amanda's medical records unless 
> she chooses to disclose them. They're all just assumptions. The
questions 
> regarding the jury house will never be verifiable, we'll simply have to 
> take the word of those who were present there. And of course I wasn't 
> being serious about the validity of the other questions, I was making
the 
> point that the GP question was verifiable to many (maybe even most) 
> viewers because it had a tangible answer whereas the others didn't. So
as 
> crazy as those theories may be, they're no crazier than the GP answer 
> switch theory.
>
> As for your argument that Sharon winning HOH would have been bad for 
> Sheila, all that would have meant was Sharon would be in the F3. I don't

> think it would have hurt Sheila's chances of making it to F2 but I do 
> think Sheila would have a better shot against Sharon than against Adam
so 
> keeping Sharon instead would have been to her advantage.

The GP question only had a verifiable answer if we use your convoluted 
definitions. The GP toy question is totally unverifiable because even if
the 
answer is "fiction" BB could have easily said "fact" and just added in one

last twist to the game. A simple "expect the unexpected" would do.

You're totally off base about Amanda. Are you saying that the hospital 
allowed their name to be used as part of a scam on viewers? Also, Amanda's

and Alli's emergencies were reported right away by the main stream press. 
Were they duped as well or is just possible that some reporters actually
saw 
them in the hospitable? Grodner will do a lot things to liven up the show 
but I can't see her asking HGs to fake illnesses and getting numerous
non-BB 
people and organizations to play along.

Brian




 38 Posts in Topic:
Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:15:39 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:17:28 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
kat <sixkats@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-21 22:28:07 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"michael" <d  2008-04-21 22:37:44 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"are you kidding&quo  2008-04-22 05:43:26 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"are you kidding&quo  2008-04-22 05:41:07 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:58:22 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"are you kidding&quo  2008-04-22 06:49:13 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 10:55:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Chaldean   2008-04-22 10:11:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
kat <sixkats@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-21 22:47:25 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-22 00:43:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 06:09:26 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 00:40:41 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 08:18:10 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 02:48:46 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 19:19:08 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 17:28:51 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-22 19:58:56 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-23 05:33:08 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-23 02:53:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-23 06:00:22 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-23 14:56:35 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 10:34:36 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-24 06:33:24 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-24 07:24:54 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-24 11:38:21 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
The Horny Goat <lcrave  2008-04-23 15:03:34 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 10:38:37 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
D-W <D_Dubya@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-23 10:39:20 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
doob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 13:40:18 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Dale Hicks <dgh1138@[E  2008-04-23 19:34:20 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Haggardly Defiance&  2008-04-22 11:24:25 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 19:08:29 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"alooo" <uh@  2008-04-22 17:27:20 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
JT's Ghost <justatroll  2008-04-22 12:04:31 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
Chaldean   2008-04-21 22:47:29 
Re: Spoiler--Down to 3 (4/21/2008)
"Brian Smith" &  2008-04-22 05:53:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri May 16 21:55:46 CDT 2008.