Talk About Network

Google




Play Stock Market Games
Fantasy Stock Picking Contest

Television > Tv Boston-common > Re: CT New Engl...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 10 of 42 Topic 38 of 77
Post > Topic >>

Re: CT New England? Hardly...

by "\"Guest\"" <n0gar@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 27, 2004 at 03:22 PM

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00D5_01C4A484.4D3D2E30
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Re: CT New England?  Hardly...
  "Kristy Gleason" <kristyNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message =
news:cj8q2h$b15$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    ""Guest"" <n0gar@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message =
news:QpL5d.12883$sG4.4627@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
       That was my whole point!  Don't classify the whole state based on =
what others think or just because the capital thinks the way it does.

              Isn't that exactly what YOU were doing in your original =
post, however???  Classifying the WHOLE state of CT as part of the =
NYC/NJ/CT tri-state area but not a part of New England??  That's =
certainly how it came across.=20


      Well I apologize if that was the case.

          I know that it is considered that.  It is also considered a =
part of the NY, NJ, CT tri-state.  So I maintain that there are =
different regions and they all should be respected and no one region =
should be assumed or put  on us by those in a nother.

                  You might want to try practicing what you preach then. =
 Your original post was chock full of insults toward other inhabitants =
of New England (whether they live in CT or other states in the region).

          From reading some of your responses to other people, you =
appear to have a mammoth-sized chip on your shoulder because YOU feel =
that your little corner of CT *should* be considered part of the =
"tri-state" area instead of New England.  You appear to have a major =
hard-on for all things NY and you definitely appear to be obsessing over =
something that can be easily remedied by moving to a location that does =
consider itself a part of the tri-state region (ie, NY or NJ).  Or you =
can simply block all TV and radio stations that center their re****ts on =
New England (which you appear to detest) and listen/watch only to NY/NJ =
stations, which if THEY think your little corner of CT is part of the =
tri-state region, let THEM cover it.  Maybe you should take up your =
fight with THOSE stations to INCLUDE southwestern CT since you're so =
convinced that it's part of THEIR region.

          I have written them in the past.  To be honest, SW CT does not =
have an independent system for news without it being NEWS12.  NYC =
stations cover us, but not as strongly as NJ(which seems to dominate NY =
news).  I can understand that since Jersey is closer.
------=_NextPart_000_00D5_01C4A484.4D3D2E30
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Re: CT New England? =A0Hardly...</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV>"Kristy Gleason" &lt;<A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:kristyNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">kristyNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>=
&gt;=20
  wrote in message <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:cj8q2h$b15$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:cj8q2h$b15$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
  style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV>""Guest"" &lt;<A=20
    href=3D"mailto:n0gar@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">n0gar@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&gt; wrote in =
message=20
    <A=20
    =
href=3D"news:QpL5d.12883$sG4.4627@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:QpL5d.=
12883$sG4.4627@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
    style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
      <DIV><FONT size=3D2>&nbsp;</FONT><FONT size=3D2>That was my whole =
point!&nbsp;=20
      Don't classify the whole state based on what others think or just =
because=20
      the capital thinks the way it=20
      does.<BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <EM><FONT=20
      face=3DArial>Isn't that exactly what YOU were doing in your =
original post,=20
      however???&nbsp; Classifying the WHOLE state of CT as part of the=20
      NYC/NJ/CT tri-state area but not a part of New England??&nbsp; =
That's=20
      certainly how it came across.&nbsp;</FONT></EM></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><EM><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT></EM>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><EM><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT></EM>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><EM><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Well I apologize if that was =
the=20
      case.</FONT></EM></DIV>
      <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
      style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
        <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
        style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
          <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
          <DIV><FONT size=3D2>I know that it is considered that.&nbsp; =
It is also=20
          considered a part of the NY, NJ, CT tri-state.&nbsp; So I =
maintain=20
          that there are different regions and they all should be =
respected and=20
          no one region should be assumed or put&nbsp; on us by those in =
a=20
          nother.</FONT></DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><EM></EM></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20
          size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <EM>You =
might want=20
          to try practicing what you preach then.&nbsp; Your original =
post was=20
          chock full of insults toward other inhabitants of New England =
(whether=20
          they live in CT or other states in the =
region).</EM></FONT></DIV>
          <DIV><EM><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT></EM>&nbsp;</DIV>
          <DIV><EM><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>From reading some of your =
responses=20
          to other people, you appear to have a mammoth-sized chip on =
your=20
          shoulder because YOU feel that your little corner of CT =
*should* be=20
          considered part of the "tri-state" area instead of New =
England.&nbsp;=20
          You appear to have a major hard-on for all things NY and you=20
          definitely appear to be obsessing over something that can be =
easily=20
          remedied by moving to a location that does consider itself a =
part of=20
          the tri-state region (ie, NY or NJ).&nbsp; Or you can simply =
block all=20
          TV and radio stations that center their re****ts on New England =
(which=20
          you appear to detest) and listen/watch only to NY/NJ stations, =
which=20
          if THEY think your little corner of CT is part of the =
tri-state=20
          region, let THEM cover it.&nbsp; Maybe you should take up your =
fight=20
          with THOSE stations to INCLUDE southwestern CT since you're so =

          convinced that it's part of THEIR region.</FONT></EM></DIV>
          <DIV><EM><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT></EM>&nbsp;</DIV>
          <DIV><EM><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have written them in =
the=20
          past.&nbsp; To be honest, SW CT does not have an independent =
system=20
          for news without it being NEWS12.&nbsp; NYC stations cover us, =
but not=20
          as strongly as NJ(which seems to dominate NY news).&nbsp; I =
can=20
          understand that since Jersey is=20
      =
closer.</FONT></EM></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQU=
OTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_00D5_01C4A484.4D3D2E30--
 




 42 Posts in Topic:
CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-25 23:35:05 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
Kevin Napolillo <bruin  2004-09-25 21:11:20 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-26 05:59:57 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
Kevin Napolillo <bruin  2004-09-26 07:38:44 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Collin Smith"   2004-09-26 01:33:45 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-26 18:17:11 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Kristy Gleason"  2004-09-26 20:13:39 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-27 03:03:12 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Kristy Gleason"  2004-09-27 06:30:56 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-27 15:22:39 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Jim Tiberio" &  2004-09-26 03:03:18 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Bob" <luna5  2004-09-26 05:08:49 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-26 15:58:16 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Liz" <Malle  2004-09-26 16:41:12 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-26 22:52:30 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Liz" <Malle  2004-09-26 21:24:01 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-27 03:14:46 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
someone <nospam@[EMAIL  2004-09-27 10:16:16 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Jim Tiberio" &  2004-09-26 19:25:45 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Liz" <Malle  2004-09-26 21:28:20 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-27 03:29:36 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Liz" <Malle  2004-09-27 17:27:02 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-27 22:03:43 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Liz" <Malle  2004-09-28 15:21:03 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-28 21:42:50 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-27 03:15:40 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Kristy Gleason"  2004-09-27 06:33:06 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-27 15:39:38 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Roger Christie"  2004-09-27 13:09:06 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Liz" <Malle  2004-09-27 17:31:34 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Steve" <kla  2004-09-27 09:01:00 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
morgaine <morgaine@[EM  2004-09-27 14:46:30 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-27 17:03:09 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"Terry Tomasi"   2004-09-27 22:45:38 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-28 06:02:44 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
zola6467@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-09-28 13:45:40 
Re: CT New England? Hardly...
"\"Guest\"  2004-09-28 21:46:24 
Hey, about this...
"\"Guest\"  2004-10-14 02:44:29 
Re: Hey, about this...
nospambsfan@[EMAIL PROTEC  2004-10-14 12:02:15 
Re: Hey, about this...
"\"Guest\"  2004-10-14 21:55:24 
Re: Hey, about this...
haroldschultzlive@[EMAIL   2004-10-14 20:58:38 
Re: Hey, about this...
"\"Guest\"  2004-10-15 20:34:23 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Aug 8 14:46:19 CDT 2008.