Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]

In article <PDuYj.30451$1q4.29387@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Fallen
<fallen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
wrote:

> DavidW wrote:
> 
> > As I mentioned in another thread, I am new to BTVS. I am just coming
up to 
> > the
> > end of season 2. I am thinking back to the episode with the other
slayer,
> > Kendra. She turned up because Buffy had died, very briefly, earlier
on. 
> > This
> > implies that when one slayer dies, another will soon replace her. From
the
> > vamps' point of view then, there's no point in killing a slayer unless
that
> > slayer is a particularly strong one like Buffy, since the replacement
is 
> > most
> > likely not going to be as strong. Conversely, if the current slayer is
a
> > particularly weak one, wouldn't it be in the vamps' interests to
protect 
> > her,
> > since if they kill her the next one is likely to be stronger?
> 
> 
> Yes, it would behoove a more intelligent vampire to try and 
> cripple/capture a slayer rather than kill one. However you'll soon learn

> not to think too hard about pretty much anything in Buffy as your brain 
> will melt :)

i assume that one of the duties of a watcher
is if his slayer is crippled but still alive
that he will have to kill her to allow the next slayer to start

arf meow arf  -  everything thing i know i learned
from the collective unconscience of odd bodkins
sacramento - political pigsty of the western world
call me desdenova seven seven seven seven seven