Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]

"DavidW" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:cvoYj.2805$aS1.755@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As I mentioned in another thread, I am new to BTVS. I am just coming up
to 
> the
> end of season 2. I am thinking back to the episode with the other
slayer,
> Kendra. She turned up because Buffy had died, very briefly, earlier on. 
> This
> implies that when one slayer dies, another will soon replace her. From
the
> vamps' point of view then, there's no point in killing a slayer unless 
> that
> slayer is a particularly strong one like Buffy, since the replacement is

> most
> likely not going to be as strong. Conversely, if the current slayer is a
> particularly weak one, wouldn't it be in the vamps' interests to protect

> her,
> since if they kill her the next one is likely to be stronger?


Or just put the slayer in a cage for 20 years, and have at it.