Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > Buffy v Slayer > Re: Should vamp...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 22 of 45 Topic 8329 of 8467
Post > Topic >>

Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]

by "One Bit Shy" <OBS@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 22, 2008 at 07:44 PM

"Fallen" <fallen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:eChZj.39868$EH5.1694@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> One Bit Shy wrote:

>> I have no first hand knowledge of intent.  As far as I can tell,
neither 
>> do you.  I can only express my opinions and the inferences I draw.  But

>> then, you're on record opposing actually thinking about such things.
>
> Uhm yes you do have knowledge of intent. We've been talking about it.
The 
> voice coach was told to make her sound Jamaican.

I've already agreed that the source of the accent is Jamaican.  How
Jamaican 
it actually sounds like isn't so universally agreed upon.  But, yes, in
the 
process of producing the episodes, Jamaican was chosen as an accent.


> Are you suggesting that dialogue coaches can just make up what accent
they 
> give to characters in shows?

Not arbitrarily, no.  But the extent of his involvement in the choice kind

of depends on the charge given him.  If Mutant Enemy wanted Jamaican going

in, then he wouldn't have much influence.  But if their objective was 
something more general like an exotic foreign sounding accent that would
fit 
somebody who looks like Bianca Lawson, then it would make sense to turn to

an expert in dialects to select an appropriate one.

At a lower level of detail, Marti seems to make it clear that it was only 
the voice coach who was determined to pin the dialect down to something
very 
specific.


> Your entire argument seems to be based on one person, who admits that 
> she's 'supposed' to sound jamaican', thinking that she didn't really
sound 
> that jamaican and that she didn't say 'HI I'm kendra, from Cap town'
when 
> she turned up.

That person being the writer of course - presumably in a position to know.

In any case, the core of my argument is that the show doesn't say where 
Kendra's from.  The script doesn't say - doesn't even mention an accent. 
The character is shrouded in mystery from the start - appearing 
unexpectedly, looking and sounding exotic, initially confused with a team
of 
assassins, and so vague about her origin that she doesn't even have a last

name.  The only thing actually made clear is that she's another Slayer. 
Lots of detail is given about her being a Slayer.

The only thing that might point to a home is an odd accent and manner of 
speaking that many people find difficult to recognize.  I don't think
that's 
a lot to go on.


> When a character turns up in a show with a specific and recognisable (to

> most people, not to one random women) accent,

I'm not convinced that it's "most".  It's certain that many people besides

Marti Noxon don't recognize it.  I've seen comments about Kendra's
peculiar 
accent for years from many sources.  And Marti isn't a "random" woman. 
She 
wrote the story.


> then that's where they are from unless they say otherwise. Simple
Occam's 
> Razor argument.
>
> There is significant evidence pointing to her being Jamaican and 
> absolutely no evidence pointing towards her being from anywhere else.

Let me correct that last part.  There's absolutely no other evidence 
pointing towards her being from anywhere.  In the tradition of the dog
that 
didn't bark, perhaps the primary clue is the lack of identifying 
information.  It would be the accent that's the outlier.  Try Occam's
Razor 
on that.

You seem determined to work the problem back.  Let me gently suggest that 
working the problem forward from different hypotheses can be fruitful too.

I've suggested that the show may have wanted Kendra's origin to be
unknown. 
I think that's a rational writing choice as I discussed elsewhere.  But is

the result consistent with that intent?  I think so.  The script and
actual 
dialogue contain no identifying information and even some extra vagueness
by 
Kendra not having a last name.

The only contradicting element might be the accent.  But she has to speak 
something - probably some form of English since it's an American TV show. 
Wouldn't an American or British or Australian accent overly identify 
somebody who's supposed to be of a mysterious background?  You would want 
something more exotic.  There are probably multiple solutions to that. 
Maybe go for something like English taught to a Russian by a Frenchman. 
Or 
create an entire dialect from scratch.  More practical would be to base
the 
accent on something real - like some third world dialect - and gum it up 
some in the process of making it understandable.  Then rely on its
relative 
obscurity to generally confuse an American audience that will hear
something 
vaguely familiar in the same sense that World Music sounds familiar, even 
though they can't tell if it's from South Africa, Brazil or Micronesia.

Your hypothesis would seem to be that they want Kendra to be from Jamaica.

The accent would be consistent with that, though I dispute how clearly so.

Especially when relying on that alone.  More to the point, if Mutant Enemy

wanted for some reason to have Kendra identified as from Jamaica, why 
doesn't the show say so?  It's not as if there's any lack of op****tunity 
where that would be a natural, even expected topic of conversation.  It 
doesn't seem consistent to me to deliberately choose a nationality and
then 
avoid all mention of it.

OBS
 




 45 Posts in Topic:
Leadership
008 <22265737@[EMAIL P  2008-05-17 05:54:09 
Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"DavidW" <no  2008-05-20 09:56:05 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"DavidW" <no  2008-05-20 09:58:03 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
espie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-20 09:25:15 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Don Sample <dsample@[E  2008-05-20 13:17:28 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Thanatos <atropos@[EMA  2008-05-20 19:32:54 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Don Sample <dsample@[E  2008-05-20 20:18:35 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Thanatos <atropos@[EMA  2008-05-20 22:21:19 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Don Sample <dsample@[E  2008-05-21 03:52:23 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Thanatos <atropos@[EMA  2008-05-21 06:17:39 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Fallen <fallen@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 15:41:39 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Don Sample <dsample@[E  2008-05-21 13:49:25 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Thanatos <atropos@[EMA  2008-05-21 15:35:34 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Don Sample <dsample@[E  2008-05-21 16:11:32 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Thanatos <atropos@[EMA  2008-05-21 16:29:59 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"One Bit Shy" &  2008-05-21 19:38:46 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Fallen <fallen@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 00:45:09 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"One Bit Shy" &  2008-05-22 02:01:39 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Thanatos <atropos@[EMA  2008-05-22 08:27:17 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"One Bit Shy" &  2008-05-22 17:52:51 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Fallen <fallen@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 17:57:22 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"One Bit Shy" &  2008-05-22 19:44:30 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Fallen <fallen@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 02:49:19 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"One Bit Shy" &  2008-05-23 03:29:54 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Thanatos <atropos@[EMA  2008-05-21 20:03:23 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"One Bit Shy" &  2008-05-22 02:01:40 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Thanatos <atropos@[EMA  2008-05-22 08:23:04 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"One Bit Shy" &  2008-05-22 17:36:46 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Don Sample <dsample@[E  2008-05-22 20:44:46 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Thanatos <atropos@[EMA  2008-05-22 21:24:01 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"DavidW" <no  2008-05-23 11:58:21 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Thanatos <atropos@[EMA  2008-05-23 07:32:36 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"John Briggs" &  2008-05-26 19:09:14 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Don Sample <dsample@[E  2008-05-26 14:37:29 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"John Briggs" &  2008-05-26 20:11:24 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Don Sample <dsample@[E  2008-05-26 17:26:40 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"One Bit Shy" &  2008-05-26 18:33:10 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"DavidW" <no  2008-05-27 09:38:23 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Thanatos <atropos@[EMA  2008-05-26 16:29:38 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Fallen <fallen@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 02:51:52 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Fallen <fallen@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 02:58:29 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
"One Bit Shy" &  2008-05-23 04:54:49 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
Fallen <fallen@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 00:38:45 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-05-21 20:21:59 
Re: Should vamps protect some slayers? [spoiler]
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-05-20 18:11:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Aug 30 8:58:11 CDT 2008.