"Peahen" <Peahen1955@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:fn5nj0$am0$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Cathy F." <clfrclfr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:A7WdnXQTUdcFwwvaRVn_vwA@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "Peahen" <Peahen1955@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:fn5buo$f2b$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>I am absolutely terrified that the Clinton/Obama brouhaha will weaken
the
>>>Democratic ticket and make room for the Republicans to take over
again...
>>
>> Hopefully, they're both smart enough to realize this and cut out the
>> baloney.
>>
>> Cathy
>>
>
> I am always amazed at how smart politicians (i.e. my choices) can run
> incredibly stupid campaigns, while their competitors practice
Machiavelli.
> I sometimes think I should refrain from politics at all, since my picks
> are generally jinxed (first primaries, so I pick second or third choice,
> then general....).
>
> So okay, we are the older women demographic that the polls keep listing
> for Clinton. Just curious about whom you're sup****ting and why.....
I'm pretty much open to Clinton, Obama, or Edwards. There are aspects of
each one I like & aspects of which I'm a bit leery. IOW, I'm undecided.
Any of them is *way* better than what we've had for the last 7 years, IMO.
Although I truly doubt that Edwards will make the final cut...
>
> And what you think about the campaigning and issues.
I'm siupiosed to be correcting papers & fini****ng up re****t cards (can you
say: ngs as stall tactics!?), & this would take too much thought & typing,
so I'm passing on an answer.
Cathy
>
> My ideologies are probably closest to what Edwards espouses, but I'll be
> voting for Obama. After 8 years of both voting for and sup****ting
Bill
> Clinton way back when, I'm really sick of the Clinton machine and the
> tactics I've been seeing over the last two months have made me angry.
>
|
