"Cathy F." <clfrclfr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:ULmdnclrf8W3Hgva4p2dnAA@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Peahen" <Peahen1955@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:fn5nj0$am0$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "Cathy F." <clfrclfr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:A7WdnXQTUdcFwwvaRVn_vwA@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> "Peahen" <Peahen1955@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:fn5buo$f2b$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>I am absolutely terrified that the Clinton/Obama brouhaha will weaken
>>>>the Democratic ticket and make room for the Republicans to take over
>>>>again...
>>>
>>> Hopefully, they're both smart enough to realize this and cut out the
>>> baloney.
>>>
>>> Cathy
>>>
>>
>> I am always amazed at how smart politicians (i.e. my choices) can run
>> incredibly stupid campaigns, while their competitors practice
>> Machiavelli. I sometimes think I should refrain from politics at all,
>> since my picks are generally jinxed (first primaries, so I pick second
or
>> third choice, then general....).
>>
>> So okay, we are the older women demographic that the polls keep listing
>> for Clinton. Just curious about whom you're sup****ting and why.....
>
> I'm pretty much open to Clinton, Obama, or Edwards. There are aspects of
> each one I like & aspects of which I'm a bit leery. IOW, I'm undecided.
> Any of them is *way* better than what we've had for the last 7 years,
IMO.
> Although I truly doubt that Edwards will make the final cut...
>
>>
>> And what you think about the campaigning and issues.
>
> I'm siupiosed to be correcting papers & fini****ng up re****t cards (can
you
> say: ngs as stall tactics!?), & this would take too much thought &
typing,
> so I'm passing on an answer.
>
> Cathy
>
That's fair. It's certainly not my intention to try to start a flame war
or
even argument. I'm absolutely not going to try to change opinions. I
agree
that any of the 3 would be beter than any Republican, and that Edwards has
virtually no chance (unless that and the upcoming debate signals a huge
****ft). I'm just curious.
|
