On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 05:43:47 GMT, "Brian Smith"
<dcg_brian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
><pkj0891@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:p46eg31l6losudbqi46hghg2vcoq3o59lv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:45:32 -0700, Ellen K Hursh <ekhursh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Oct 5, 11:34 pm, pkj0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>
>>>> What I really wish the wardrobe folks would do is to get rid of that
>>>> incredibly silly straw hat he wears. It's awful. It makes his face
>>>> look even heavier. Maybe they think it's hiding his fuller face, but
>>>> un-unh . . . it just makes his head look humongous. Gris isn't
>>>> supposed to be a fa****on maven, so I have no problem with how they
>>>> dress him - but that freakin' hat - YIKES!
>>>
>>>You think the fugly farmer's hat (which I *do* kinda like) is bad...
>>>what about the uber-fugly beret he was wearing?
>>
>> I hate to say it, but it's beyond silly. He looked ridiculous.
>>
>> When you have a large skull, as WP does, you skip any and all
>> headgear, other than a baseball cap. And then combine that with a
>> weight gain in the face . . . I thought the wardrobe dept. was
>> supposed to be expert in accentuating the positive. Guess not.
>
>And I thought he was wearing the hat for protection from the sun! I think
it
>also adds to the type of character he plays.
Yeah, I didn't have a problem with the hat because the sun would be
really strong out in Las Vegas so wearing a hat makes sense, and the
type he was wearing would give him some protection for his neck as
well as his face. It's not great from a fa****on sense but he's on the
job so it makes sense to not worry about the looks over the usability.
Now, the beret was just a plain horrible choice. There's no reason to
believe that would be the kind of head covering Grissom would choose,
and it didn't add anything to the scene. I wonder how many people
thought that actually enhanced Grissom's looks in that scene?
|
