Re: CSI Miami - 4th Amendment Violation of the Week

In article <151020070144178127%cmn-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Mark Nobles <cmn-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> > In article <xuTOi.95$I44.83@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >  Tony Harding <ToHard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > 
> > > Anim8rFSK wrote:
> > > > In article <atropos-E898C1.01510009102007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > >  Thanatos <atropos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >> In article 
> > > >> <ANIM8Rfsk-5868DF.22412708102007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > >>  Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> In article <atropos-555174.23435408102007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > >>>  Thanatos <atropos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Calleigh and pretty boy walk onto the suspect's property
> > > >>>> and start photographing his color-****fting car with no
> > > >>>> warrant and no consent. Then to make matters worse, pretty
> > > >>>> boy reaches into the car, moves aside a Thermos and removes
> > > >>>> a set of handcuff links.
> > > >>>> I guess the Miami crime lab is exempt from the 4th Amendment.
> > > >>>> And since it was the illegally obtained evidence that caused
> > > >>>> the suspect to spontaneously confess, the confession is
> > > >>>> inadmissible as well.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Way to go crime techs.
> > > >>> I suppose they MIGHT have had a warrant for the vehicle and
> > > >>> just not mentioned it.
> > > >> They're usually quite vocal about presenting warrants to suspects
on 
> > > >> the 
> > > >> CSI shows. It goes with the whole arrogant "we're the po-lice
don't 
> > > >> even 
> > > >> think about ****ing with us" attitude with which the shows are 
> > > >> written.
> > > >>
> > > >>>> Oh, and why is a county vehicle more secure than any
> > > >>>> other vehicle?
> > > >>> I laughed out loud when she said that. BoaVista really took
> > > >>> her stupid pills this week.
> > > >> Not to mention she's still about the most suck-ass shot I've ever

> > > >> seen. 
> > > >> And all that the "best of the best" gun tutor could think of tell
her 
> > > >> was "squeeze the trigger, don't jerk it"? Welcome to Shooting
101. 
> > > >> Every 
> > > >> instructor before him would have been telling her that. She's 
> > > >> obviously 
> > > >> got much more severe problems.
> > > > 
> > > > You'd think Ryan would have brought that up.  And for God's sake 
> > > > people, 
> > > > move the damn target CLOSER to her.  She's missing it COMPLETELY,
and 
> > > > there's no back wall.  You can't even tell what direction or
directions 
> > > > she's missing in!
> > > 
> > > Something else that bugged me last week was how Ryan walked down to
get 
> > > the target after Natalia did her thing - firstly, a major safety
gaff 
> > > (as someone else pointed out), plus I've never seen a pistol range
in 
> > > which people walked out to the targets, they're reeled back on a 
> > > pulley/cord arrangement. I can't imagine a range where people have
to 
> > > walk onto the range twice to shoot - once to place the target, again
to 
> > > retrieve it.
> > 
> > Yeah.  You wouldn't want that arrangement with more than one lane; 
> > everybody has to stop shooting every time you reset a target?
> 
> You've never been to an outdoor range? None of them I've ever been to

In Arizona, outdoor ranges are called "the Indian reservation"

> has a cable system. The range closes, everyone unloads their weapon,
> walks out and sets their targets, then when everyone is done and back
> behind the firing line, the rangemaster opens the range. When the
> shooting slows down, he repeats the cycle. It takes a little more
> discipline and cooperation, but neither is a bad thing.

Huh.  I sure wouldn't walk out there assuming BoaVista knew the rules . 
.. 
> 
> I was at the range one day, and there were ducks walking around calmly
> mucking for worms while bullets whizzed two feet over their heads.

-- 
Jitterbug phone works!  (Third time's a charm!)