Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > CSI > Re: NY: 333 SPO...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 11 of 21 Topic 1878 of 1997
Post > Topic >>

Re: NY: 333 SPOILER

by Thanatos <atropos@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 1, 2007 at 04:36 PM

In article <sl94j.34682$Gp5.3262@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Victor <NOvbuttaroSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Richard Evans wrote:

> > Tony Harding <ToHard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> > And how would you get access to the subway system
> > computers to ensure you had an accurate test bed?

> Truth be told this argument is pointless as what you
> saw on CSI-NY probably has no connection what-so-ever
> with the real NYC transit system.

Nor with the law. As with the technical aspects of the computer subway 
controls, the show also played fast and loose with the law.

They made a big show of the Chicago cop lecturing Taylor about how "this 
isn't a joint investigation" and "your badge doesn't work here".

Well, first, that's not her call to make. She's just a detective. Such 
things are decided at the deputy chief level or above and in a scenario 
like the one on the show, it very much *would* be a joint investigation. 
You have a killer who is obviously committing crimes in both 
jurisdictions and there would be a whole myriad of issues that would 
need to be coordinated in anticipation of catching the guy: chain of 
custody issues for evidence, conflict-of-laws issues, etc. Both the NYPD 
and the Chicago PD would establish a cooperative investigation from the 
get-go. Not fight over turf like that snooty Chicago detective seemed 
determined to do.

In reality, the most likely scenario is that the FBI would have taken 
over the investigation, especially once traces of anthrax (a known WMD) 
were found at one of the crime scenes.

The Chicago cop also told Taylor she'd need to get fingerprints from him 
for elimination purposes. Huh? Taylor is a cop. His fingerprints will be 
in AFIS just like all other cops. It's one of the requirements for 
becoming a law enforcement officer.

Then back in the lab, that cocky lab tech (whose name I can never 
remember) tells everyone that the "DNA from the subject's fingerprints 
matched". Huh? I've been in law enforcement for many years now and I 
never knew you could get DNA from a fingerprint (absent some other 
medium like a fingerprint left in blood). Those guys are *good*.

And I always like it how almost every show includes a scene where one of 
the lab techs (this time it was Stella) throws up their hands in 
frustration and says, "I've been over this a thousand times and we've 
got no leads here!" and then someone else says "Well, let's go over it 
one more time" and before they can even put both rubber gloves on, the 
first tech gets a flash of insight that essentially solves the case. 
This time it was Stella with the color of the X's on her puzzle piece.

I also liked how everyone was so paranoid that the perp was going to 
boobytrap his place, but then they all go off alone searching from room 
to room, so that Taylor can be conveniently coldcocked and abducted 
unseen by anyone else. I gotta say, managing to knock a cop out, abduct 
him and get away clean *while* he and a SWAT team are raiding the house 
is quite a feat.
 




 21 Posts in Topic:
CSI: NY: 333 SPOILER
Richard Evans <infodex  2007-11-29 11:57:20 
Re: CSI: NY: 333 SPOILER
Teckla <teckla@[EMAIL   2007-11-30 15:06:39 
Re: CSI: NY: 333 SPOILER
"Smokie Darling (Ann  2007-11-30 08:35:16 
Re: CSI: NY: 333 SPOILER
Tony Harding <ToHard@[  2007-11-30 21:21:39 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
"Mike Minor" &l  2007-11-30 10:42:13 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
Richard Evans <infodex  2007-11-30 11:17:54 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
Tony Harding <ToHard@[  2007-11-30 21:26:39 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
Richard Evans <infodex  2007-11-30 21:53:50 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
Victor <NOvbuttaroSPAM  2007-12-01 08:56:56 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
aemeijers <aemeijers@[  2007-12-01 12:04:15 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
Thanatos <atropos@[EMA  2007-12-01 16:36:54 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
Tony Harding <ToHard@[  2007-12-01 05:57:39 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
"Smokie Darling (Ann  2007-11-30 08:35:58 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
Richard Evans <infodex  2007-11-30 16:19:02 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
Tony Harding <ToHard@[  2007-11-30 21:27:51 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
Richard Evans <infodex  2007-11-30 21:52:55 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
Tony Harding <ToHard@[  2007-12-01 05:44:23 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
Richard Evans <infodex  2007-12-01 09:53:07 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
"Mike Minor" &l  2007-12-01 20:22:08 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
Martin Phipps <martinp  2007-12-01 18:05:19 
Re: NY: 333 SPOILER
Thanatos <atropos@[EMA  2007-12-02 13:19:21 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 20 4:46:11 CDT 2008.