In article
<731fa53d-f27a-476f-87cd-a24c064165b9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Dec 2, 5:36 am, Thanatos <atro...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > In article <sl94j.34682$Gp5.3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >
> > Victor <NOvbuttaroS...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > Richard Evans wrote:
> > > > Tony Harding <ToH...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > And how would you get access to the subway system
> > > > computers to ensure you had an accurate test bed?
> > > Truth be told this argument is pointless as what you
> > > saw on CSI-NY probably has no connection what-so-ever
> > > with the real NYC transit system.
> >
> > Nor with the law. As with the technical aspects of the computer subway
> > controls, the show also played fast and loose with the law.
> >
> > They made a big show of the Chicago cop lecturing Taylor about how
"this
> > isn't a joint investigation" and "your badge doesn't work here".
> >
> > Well, first, that's not her call to make. She's just a detective. Such
> > things are decided at the deputy chief level or above and in a
scenario
> > like the one on the show, it very much *would* be a joint
investigation.
>
> More to the point, now that the 333 stalker has killed someone in New
> York and even attempted to murder members of his team, he could well
> argue that she was obstructing justice by telling him he couldn't
> investigate in Chicago.
True, but he personally has no law enforcement authority in Chicago so
he would be powerless to do anything about it. He'd have to try to
convince another Chicago cop (or possibly the Chicago D.A.) to take
action on his complaint.
|
