by Victor <NOvbuttaroSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mar 30, 2008 at 08:13 AM
Amazing stupid isn't it? Especially your second observation. I mean
damn..all it takes it simple geometry to see that there is no way the
bride could have been hit in the head as they described it.
Either the writers are too stupid to have realized this. But then I
question if CSI Miami even has writers. Or the producers think the
audience is too stupid to notice.
Worse part is that all it would have taken would have been a couple
lines explaining that perhaps something went wrong and the gun didn't
lock onto the the target (on the back of the chair) and the bride
getting hit was dumb luck.
But no they got to lay out this bullet path that doesn't work.
As for your first comment; will you got to remember that CSI Miami uses
Star Trek technology. (one time they placed an object on the desktop
near that "Minority Report" terminal and it was scanned!) So I guess it
should come as no surprise that a jewelery maker has access to nano
technology. :)
Victor
Asher_N wrote:
> OK, so I don't usually watch CSI:M. I was bored, first new show and
all...
> 2 things struck me about this cartoon.
> 1) how can you put a GPS receiver, a RF transmitter and a suitable power
> source in a veil and nobody notices??????
> 2) how can a gun fired from ground level, aimed at a chair back 36-40
> inches off the ground hit a target 15 feet before the target, and at
least
> 24-30 inches higher. Solve that and you've probably solved the mistery
of
> the JFK bulet.
