Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > CSI > Re: CSI: Miami ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 9 Topic 1932 of 1997
Post > Topic >>

Re: CSI: Miami ep 6.14

by "Ric" <No@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 30, 2008 at 04:31 PM

"Victor" <NOvbuttaroSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:DYHHj.266655$r03.192202@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Amazing stupid isn't it? Especially your second observation. I mean 
> damn..all it takes it simple geometry to see that there is no way the 
> bride could have been hit in the head as they described it.
>
> Either the writers are too stupid to have realized this. But then I 
> question if CSI Miami even has writers. Or the producers think the 
> audience is too stupid to notice.
>
> Worse part is that all it would have taken would have been a couple
lines 
> explaining that perhaps something went wrong and the gun didn't lock
onto 
> the the target (on the back of the chair) and the bride getting hit was 
> dumb luck.
>
> But no they got to lay out this bullet path that doesn't work.
>
> As for your first comment; will you got to remember that CSI Miami uses 
> Star Trek technology. (one time they placed an object on the desktop
near 
> that "Minority Re****t" terminal and it was scanned!) So I guess it
should 
> come as no surprise that a jewelery maker has access to nano technology.

> :)
>
>
> Victor
>
>
> Asher_N wrote:
>> OK, so I don't usually watch CSI:M. I was bored, first new show and 
>> all...
>
>
>> 2 things struck me about this cartoon.
>
>> 1) how can you put a GPS receiver, a RF transmitter and a suitable
power 
>> source in a veil and nobody notices??????
>
>> 2) how can a gun fired from ground level, aimed at a chair back 36-40 
>> inches off the ground hit a target 15 feet before the target, and at 
>> least 24-30 inches higher. Solve that and you've probably solved the 
>> mistery of the JFK bulet.


I was all fired up to light up my keyboard after watching that POS that 
p***** for a member of the CSI franchise. I waited for someone...anyone to

complain about the sheer idiocy of the writing, but it seemed to go 
unnoticed all week. I thought...people finally realized that commenting on

this garbage is just a waste of time, so I let it go too. I watched it 
because the DVR was automatically recording any non re-run and, let's face

it, the writers strike hasn't left us with a lot of alternatives. This 
episode, however, was transcendent in its total disconnect with reality. I

read some newspaper article about a change in the writing staff for CSI-M 
and all I could think was "this show has writers?" Random, grade school 
students could put a more coherent, believable story together. Viewers
have 
made CSI a very successful and lucrative property for CBS and this insult
is 
how they're paid back.
 




 9 Posts in Topic:
CSI: Miami ep 6.14
"Asher_N" <c  2008-03-30 04:35:26 
Re: CSI: Miami ep 6.14
Victor <NOvbuttaroSPAM  2008-03-30 08:13:23 
Re: CSI: Miami ep 6.14
"Ric" <No@[E  2008-03-30 16:31:26 
Re: CSI: Miami ep 6.14
"Asher_N" <c  2008-03-30 23:37:00 
Re: CSI: Miami ep 6.14
aemeijers <aemeijers@[  2008-03-31 00:47:56 
Re: CSI: Miami ep 6.14
Victor <NOvbuttaroSPAM  2008-03-31 02:59:40 
Re: CSI: Miami ep 6.14
"Steve" <pre  2008-03-31 14:03:33 
Re: CSI: Miami ep 6.14
Ellen K Hursh <ekhursh  2008-04-01 07:21:03 
Re: CSI: Miami ep 6.14
"Steve" <pre  2008-04-01 14:46:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 5:52:54 CDT 2008.