by "Asher_N" <compguy666@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mar 30, 2008 at 11:37 PM
Victor <NOvbuttaroSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:DYHHj.266655$r03.192202@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Amazing stupid isn't it? Especially your second observation. I mean
> damn..all it takes it simple geometry to see that there is no way the
> bride could have been hit in the head as they described it.
>
> Either the writers are too stupid to have realized this. But then I
> question if CSI Miami even has writers. Or the producers think the
> audience is too stupid to notice.
>
> Worse part is that all it would have taken would have been a couple
> lines explaining that perhaps something went wrong and the gun didn't
> lock onto the the target (on the back of the chair) and the bride
> getting hit was dumb luck.
>
> But no they got to lay out this bullet path that doesn't work.
And I still don't get the comment that she got in the path because the
fake veil was lighter than the real one.
>
> As for your first comment; will you got to remember that CSI Miami
> uses
> Star Trek technology. (one time they placed an object on the desktop
> near that "Minority Re****t" terminal and it was scanned!) So I guess
> it should come as no surprise that a jewelery maker has access to nano
> technology. :)
>
>
> Victor
>
>
> Asher_N wrote:
>> OK, so I don't usually watch CSI:M. I was bored, first new show and
>> all...
>
>
>> 2 things struck me about this cartoon.
>
>> 1) how can you put a GPS receiver, a RF transmitter and a suitable
>> power source in a veil and nobody notices??????
>
>> 2) how can a gun fired from ground level, aimed at a chair back 36-40
>> inches off the ground hit a target 15 feet before the target, and at
>> least 24-30 inches higher. Solve that and you've probably solved the
>> mistery of the JFK bulet.
