Re: This weeks CSI:M 2 parter

"Ryan Robbins" <redbird007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:cLQIj.12935$gS1.815@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Mike Minor" <mminorhsd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:jv-dnRpTDsmsO27anZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> IMHO though, at least to a small degree, this weeks shows were a little

>> better written...
>
> Ha.
>
> What about Delco's stupid line after Horatio noticed that Calleigh had 
> probably "tapped" "60" onto the wall: At least we know she was alive
when 
> she left.
>
> Say what? The guy could have killed her after discovering she was up to 
> hanky panky, then taken her body.
>
> The conclusions the writers have the characters making are severely 
> lacking in sup****ting evidence. Another example is the fingerprints on
the 
> flask of alcohol. Yes, the presence of that guy's prints was evidence --
 
> cir***stantial. He could have handed the flask to the other guy when the

> other guy left it behind on a counter or something.

I love it when they walk up to a crime scene, look at a body on the ground

and immediately offer opinions on possible suspects.
>
>