In article <ANIM8Rfsk-D0D7AC.08301704042008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <atropos-43127E.06263404042008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Thanatos <atropos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > In article <2jm9v318qrdvuq0e470761t985d2ge7sfp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > Richard Evans <infodex@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >> By the way (yes, I know we've said this all before), but wouldn't
you
> > > >> at least ONCE like to see the crew at least acknowledge that they
> > > >> spent a good part of their investigation accusing the wrong
people?
> > > >> Yes, Julia's no prize of a person, but in the end, her thug
boyfriend
> > > >> Ron was basically innocent, right?
> > > >
> > > >Horatio is convinced he's guilty of the other murder (btw, he's
still
> > > >wearing the shoes he was when he pushed the car in the swamp a week
ago,
> > > >complete with half a shoelace for them to match).
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > Except the chain of evidence is irrevocably broken. They didn't
> > > retrieve the shoelace from the car, they retirieved it from a pile
of
> > > debris at the tow yard.
> >
> > That's the least of the legal snafus these bozos generate on a regular
> > basis.
>
> And they took it from the tow yard, where it had been steam cleaned (or
> at least pressure washed) off the vehicle, by matching it to a digitial
> photo THAT HAD BEEN STOLEN FROM THEM and returned later by an ex CSI who
> was trying to damage the department. And Horatio TOLD Ron where they
> found it!
Yep, it's enough to make a real prosecutor's head explode.
|
