by "\(Harmony\) Watcher" <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 16, 2006 at 11:26 PM
"Benjamin Pavsner" <pavsnerp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:axoag.24419$Sl4.17279@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What I've heard from Marsters in the BrVS mag (maybe the Angel mag. It
was
> one of them) is that of a Spike movie isn't done in a certain amount of
time
> (I think he said about 5 years from the end of Angel) he's absolutely
not
> interested. He said that since Spike isn't supposed to age as a vampire,
> Marsters would have aged enough (he'd be in his mid/late 40s) that it
> wouldn't work.
>
But he's wrong. CGI can do wonders these days. Aging and wrinkles will not
appear after the CGI people process the shots. The only question would be
whether he's paid enough to motivate him to reprise his role.
==Harmony Watcher==
