by David B <bothecat3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 16, 2006 at 08:13 PM
"(Harmony) Watcher" wrote:
> "Benjamin Pavsner" <pavsnerp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:axoag.24419$Sl4.17279@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > What I've heard from Marsters in the BrVS mag (maybe the Angel mag. It
was
> > one of them) is that of a Spike movie isn't done in a certain amount
of
> time
> > (I think he said about 5 years from the end of Angel) he's absolutely
not
> > interested. He said that since Spike isn't supposed to age as a
vampire,
> > Marsters would have aged enough (he'd be in his mid/late 40s) that it
> > wouldn't work.
> >
> But he's wrong. CGI can do wonders these days. Aging and wrinkles will
not
> appear after the CGI people process the shots.
In X-Men 3 they used CGI to make Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellan look 2
decades
younger. I watched a clip of it the other day and it looked weird.
Hopefully it
works better on the big screen.
