by "\(Harmony\) Watcher" <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 18, 2006 at 08:11 AM
"Barnabas Collins" <BarnabasCollinsonSF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:vh9n62puiog30ksdona7hfjecj5bdrlkrj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:26:27 GMT, "\(Harmony\) Watcher"
> <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >But he's wrong. CGI can do wonders these days. Aging and wrinkles will
not
> >appear after the CGI people process the shots. The only question would
be
> >whether he's paid enough to motivate him to reprise his role.
> Special effects/makeup/etc. wizards can do amazing stuff but
> there are limits to how much you can do to make an 85 year
> old Spike look like he is much younger.
>
> At some point JM will age out to the point where nobody will beleive
> for a second that he is the age he is supposed to be.
>
> The bottom line: William Shatner is in his 70s. Now matter how much
> makeup/speical effects magic they do Shatner will still look like a
> man in his 70s. JM will reach that point too.
>
>
Are you assuming that it is illegal to use CGI to trim Shatner's
waistline?
[Mmm, OK, what waistline? <g>]
==Harmony Watcher==
