Re: OT: Bionic Woman again

"lab~rat  >:-)" <chase@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:q3qsg350aim6nve27bb7l8l458g1hmg5oh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:15:25 -0500, z <z@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> puked:
> 
>>"lab~rat  >:-)" <chase@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
>>news:pkepg3pjsv414gkdes8i6pomnfikuo3dcr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 01:50:44 -0500, z <z@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> puked:
>>> 
>>>>"lab~rat  >:-)" <chase@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
>>>>news:oa6kg3t91j7ejov352gf7bpek0mqddvqh5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:00:17 -0400, Manfred Mann
>>>>> <ManfredMann@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> puked:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:26:57 -0400, "lab~rat  >:-)" 
>><chase@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>Who is to say you can't have more than one way to pick up sound
>>>>>>>>in that one ear?  And then use those sources in the ear to
>>>>>>>>detemine 
>>the
>>>>>>>>direction it's coming from?  In theory you could have as many 
>>sources
>>>>>>>>for picking up sound in that ear as you can fit on an
>>>>>>>>intergrated circuit board.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>How would you perceive direction with one ear?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>With the miniaturization they have today you can have
>>>>>>several receivers in the ear, they can then triangulate 
>>>>>>on the signal.  It would be the equivalant of having sevearal
>>>>>>cell phones that can be used to triangulate on the signal.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you have one reception point in your head, the sound travels
>>>>> down your ear canal.  You cannot triangulate a signal using one
>>>>> point. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>how do you know there aren't several receptors on the outside of the
>>ear 
>>>>itself. Or in her uber eyeball.
>>> 
>>> Because.  It hasn't been said.
>>
>>
>>They should have made it a comedy.  Imagine if microsoft had built the
>>OS running her system and they didn't have 'nano-bots' or whatever,
>>but had to build it using real hardware.  It'd be funny as hell with
>>her having to plug in every 10 mins to recharge her batteries and get
>>a software update.
> 
> You're definitely on to something here.  Every eight hours she'd lock
> up and there'd be a blue screen in her eyeballs and they'd have to
> reboot her.  They could do a whole deal like when they made the
> Starsky and Hutch movie.

Whats that other show with the dork squad job who knows all the secrets?  
They could get that guy to bend her over a computer desk and update her 
firmware the old fashion way.


Heh they could have the MS WORD language checker running by accident and 
make her talk gibberish half the time, while fastfind gobbles up all her 
RAM and divide by zero errors pop up whenever she thinks about a paradox.



> 
> 
>>
>>This is just another super hero show with not that great of a plot or 
>>writing .. at least not yet.
>>
>>Dark Angel had a cool setting and a hot girl and an interesting story.
>>Heros is kind of good because there are so many stories going on at
>>once. Buffy was good because of the writing and well.. vampires.
>>
>>and so on.
>>
>>The bionic woman is some chick who jumps around and fights with some
>>uber government involvement... I could give a rats ass about her and
>>some other bot chick who's got issues or whatever.  Take some fucking
>>midol and get over it.
>>
> 
> 
> I have to say that having a better looking chick in the show would
> really do more from me.

No doubt that goes a long way in a bad show.

> 
> Oh, and in case you missed it last night, she talked about going to
> Hillary Clinton for help.  If they start that shit, they might as well
> pull the plug right now...
> 

I have it on my DVR for when i'm bored.  But yea.. don't get me started 
on Hillary.  I could go the rest of my life without ever hearing another 
Hillary reference and die happy.  But the stupid bitch is probably going 
to be president and i'll have to throw out my TV and Radio.


> --
> lab~rat  >:-)
> Stupid humans...
>