Re: OT: Bionic Woman again

On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:44:49 -0700, xforge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 puked:

>On Oct 18, 7:37 am, "lab~rat  >:-)" <ch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On 17 Oct 2007 23:10:38 -0700, xfo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 puked:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Oct 17, 7:32 am, "lab~rat  >:-)" <ch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:52:28 -0700, xfo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 puked:
>>
>> >> >On Oct 15, 12:26 pm, "lab~rat  >:-)" <ch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:29:13 -0400,Forge
>> >> >> <fo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> puked:
>>
>> >> >> >In article <98n6h316lv7fk269o2mmt2o141vt9oq...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> >> >ch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>> >> >> >> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:11:19 -0400,Forge
>> >> >> >> <fo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> puked:
>>
>> >> >> >> >In article <ne1vg390oh4vuic0spd9q8hpsjleefl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> >> >> >ch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>> >> >> >> >> >I didn't get disgusted with Clinton for playing hide the
salami with
>> >> >> >> >> >someone he wasn't married to,
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Funny, I did.  If he were anyone else in the world
including my best
>> >> >> >> >> friend I would have had a problem with it.  In retrospect,
I would
>> >> >> >> >> probably had more respect for him if he pushed Hillary off
a building,
>> >> >> >> >> but that's another matter entirely...
>>
>> >> >> >> >Oh come off it. If Bush ****ed a squad of cheerleaders in the
Oval
>> >> >> >> >Office on live television, you'd just say how characteristic
of a great
>> >> >> >> >President it is that he did that. You didn't like Clinton
because you
>> >> >> >> >didn't like Clinton, so quit the bull****.
>>
>> >> >> >> That's not true.  I have no tolerance for that ****.  It is
indicative
>> >> >> >> of a serious character flaw that doesn't end at being
deceitful to
>> >> >> >> your wife.  If you can **** over someone that is your soul
mate,
>> >> >> >> someone that you took a personal oath with, then who knows
what else
>> >> >> >> you're capable of doing.
>>
>> >> >> >Again you assume Bush gives a flying **** about anyone who is
either (a)
>> >> >> >not him, or (b) not shoveling money into the bank accounts of
him or his
>> >> >> >two or three closest friends. This is simply not the case.
>>
>> >> >> Regardless, there has never been any claim of infidelity on
Bush's
>> >> >> behalf.  You can criticize him on nearly every front, but not
this
>> >> >> one.  Unless you're one of those idiots that accuse him of being
gay.
>>
>> >> >> But if it became public tomorrow that he had done the equivalent
to
>> >> >> Clinton, or cheated on his wife, I would lose any respect I had
for
>> >> >> the man.
>>
>> >> >> And if he came on tv to specifically LIE TO MY FACE about it, he
would
>> >> >> be dead to me.
>>
>> >> >> None of that **** was really anyone's business, but Clinton drew
the
>> >> >> whole country into it by holding a press conference to perpetuate
the
>> >> >> lie.  He could have taken the tact that he wasn't going to
dignify it
>> >> >> with comment, or admitted it, or maybe a million other things,
but he
>> >> >> took time out of his busy presidency to look at the camera and
shake
>> >> >> that fat fist at me and lie.  ****er.
>>
>> >> >So here we are once again, lying about a blow job: greatest crime
ever
>> >> >perpetrated upon mankind; lying an entire nation into a war with a
>>
>> >> Post proof it was a lie.
>>
>> >Oh my ****ing God. Post proof that it WASN'T.
>>
>> >1) We never found any WMDs and Colin Powell basically confessed that
>> >the WMD speech he made was entirely fabricated.
>>
>> >2) The Downing Street Memos.
>>
>> >3) Yellowcake yellowcake yellowcake yellowcake. What? There wasn't any
>> >yellowcake? Well, I'monna put it in the State of the Union address
>> >anyway, **** y'all.
>>
>> >4) If I were to start counting right now all the times he or his
>> >people have tried to say Saddam was involved in 9/11, I'd be dead of
>> >old age before I got to the end.
>>
>> >Should I go on?
>>
>> >Your denial doesn't make something that's a lie into the truth. Sorry.
>>
>> I'm sorry, the fact is that the information was erroneous.  Your story
>> contrived of events after the fact doesn't alter that in the least.
>> First and foremost, the point of the war was to remove Saddam from
>> power.  He had the op****tunity to step down and avoid the invasion
>> prior to the war and chose not to.
>
>You only believe what you want to believe.
>
>Saddam offered to step down quite a while before Bush offered any kind
>of final ultimatum.
>http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200303/18/eng20030318_113507.shtml

I call bull****.  If this were true, why didn't he?

>
>> We invaded Bosnia and Kosovo with much less provocation.
>
>And yet, the Bosnia and Kosovo invasions haven't cost us a trillion
>dollars or 4000 lives or displaced several million residents of those
>countries or killed hundreds of thousands of children and old women.
>

Yeah, but thousands of innocent civilians were killed in our long
range bombing campaign.  Does that matter at all?

--
lab~rat  >:-)
Stupid humans...