"Joe" <skyking995@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:hm8rj3lb6h43c9q18gn8ehlbo2dhqbnrfq@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:10:35 -0500, "Jim Nason"
> <jhnason@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"SciFier" <scifier@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:Z6adnZWZA-6Oy6HanZ2dnUVZ_tuonZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> "pansyfaye" <pansyfaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:IJCdndJfMqqtTabanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>> "Joe" <skyking995@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:g4blj3lk3r4aqslslsntvti1fhiljc6su9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On 13 Nov 2007 23:57:28 GMT, Tim <dingbattyone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>David Downing <David.H.Downing@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>>news:1194922895.958832.264780@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Back when DS was originally on, I seem to recall an announcment
(by
>>>>>>> Jonathan Frid) over the closing credits of one of the episodes
near
>>>>>>> the end of th 1897 storyline, saying that on such and such a day,
DS
>>>>>>> would reutrn to the year 1969. Can anybody tell me (a) whether
that
>>>>>>> was actuyally part of the episode as recorded, and thus as
appearing
>>>>>>> on the DVD, and (b) if so, which episode it is. (I'm watching the
>>>>>>> DFDs and getting near the end of the 1897 storyline now, and I
>>>>>>> wanted
>>>>>>> to be sure not to skip over it.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That occurred on Episode 885 (c17d3), but it's not in the credits of
>>>>>>that
>>>>>>episode on the Collection 17 disc. The announcement can still be
>>>>>>heard,
>>>>>>however, on the 4th DVD of Collection 26, in the "1969 ABC-TV
Footage"
>>>>>>section of the disc:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"This is Barnabas Collins. On Tuesday, November 18th, 'Dark Shadows'
>>>>>>returns to the year 1969, when one of the most terrifying tales ever
>>>>>>told
>>>>>>will begin on ABC."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It wasn't an 1897 episode, but one of the last 1795/6 ones.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tim
>>>>>
>>>>> So what was the terrifying tale that they were talking about?
Surely
>>>>> not the Adam storyline. LOL.
>>>>
>>>> It could have referred to the Dream Curse which was scary and well
done
>>>>
>>>> pansy
>>>>
>>> 1969 might have been the Leviathan storyline.
>>
>>I remember that on-air announcement when it originally ocurred in 1969.
It
>>did indeed refer to the beginning of the Leviathan story-line.
>>
>>Jim Nason (old enough to remember, and probably old enough to know
better)
>>
>
> Of course they would not say it was going to be the worst storyline in
> the history of the show. It was intended to be terrifying but really
> wasnt. Barnabas should have stayed a vampire. would have made the
> show last longer and be more interesting
There were much worse storylines than leviathan such as that horrible
summer
of 1970 one after the brilliant 1995 storyline. They bascially did another
turn of the screw aka Quentins ghost rehash but pretty much it was
horrible
having to put up with the annoying kids in almost every episode. I like
David alot but Kathy Cody got on my nerves and my god how can the David be
so stupid and repeat every mistake he made during the Quentin's Ghost
storyline. Also 1840 started out great but I felt it started to really
drag
toward the end and they rehased the witchcraft storyline they already had
done in 1795 and also the whole storyline which again I thought started
out
great became a mess as unlike 1897 it did not tie into the events of the
presant. The kids for instance were such a major part of the 1970 story
and
got barely any story at all in 1840. The pirate ship and the crew is
another
thing totally forgotten and they also made major blunders like killing
Edith
when she is alive in 1897 and how did Roxanne beocme a vampire orignally
if
Barnabas and Julia weren't there and the list goes on and on.
|
