Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:ANIM8Rfsk-
C3F6EA.18493608012008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <Xns9A1F983C2404taustingmail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <terry.notaniceperson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>> JohnGavin <dagdern@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> news:54dd2c83-b2e5-4fbb-b8f4-15894bd3d007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> om:
>>
>> > On Jan 8, 5:02 pm, Anim8rFSK <ANIM8R...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> In article
>> >> <ws21-83A0DD.14350108012...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Bill
>> >> Steele <w...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > The 1990s version is noteworthy mostly for its unoriginality.
>> >> > It was,
>> >
>> >> > AFAIK, the first ever remake of a TV series as a TV series.
>> >> > (In the o
>> > ld
>> >> > Hollywood sense of a remake, actually redoing the original
>> >> > plot.)
>> >>
>> >> The Mission Impossible revival did it first.
>> >>
>> > It would then be more accurate to say that it was the first and
>> > only remake of a daytime soap as a TV series. It's pretty weird
>> > to think that a daytime soap opera is soon to become a major
>> > feature film. I mean, could anyone imagine Days of Our Lives as
>> > a major motion picture??
>> >
>> > The 1990s version had none of the charisma or magic of the 60s
>> > Dark Shadows. It was completely plastic.
>> >
>> Is it really more suprising than the Bewitched movie?
>
> It certainly can't be any worse.
>
I'm not sure that even Alien Apocalypse was worse.
--
Terry Austin
"Dude, we're all your bitch, but only Ken's wearing the juice."
- tussock
|
