In article <Xns9A1FDBE9666DCtaustingmail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Terry Austin <terry.notaniceperson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:ANIM8Rfsk-
> C3F6EA.18493608012008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > In article <Xns9A1F983C2404taustingmail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <terry.notaniceperson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> JohnGavin <dagdern@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >> news:54dd2c83-b2e5-4fbb-b8f4-15894bd3d007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> om:
> >>
> >> > On Jan 8, 5:02 pm, Anim8rFSK <ANIM8R...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> In article
> >> >> <ws21-83A0DD.14350108012...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Bill
> >> >> Steele <w...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > The 1990s version is noteworthy mostly for its unoriginality.
> >> >> > It was,
> >> >
> >> >> > AFAIK, the first ever remake of a TV series as a TV series.
> >> >> > (In the o
> >> > ld
> >> >> > Hollywood sense of a remake, actually redoing the original
> >> >> > plot.)
> >> >>
> >> >> The Mission Impossible revival did it first.
> >> >>
> >> > It would then be more accurate to say that it was the first and
> >> > only remake of a daytime soap as a TV series. It's pretty weird
> >> > to think that a daytime soap opera is soon to become a major
> >> > feature film. I mean, could anyone imagine Days of Our Lives as
> >> > a major motion picture??
> >> >
> >> > The 1990s version had none of the charisma or magic of the 60s
> >> > Dark Shadows. It was completely plastic.
> >> >
> >> Is it really more suprising than the Bewitched movie?
> >
> > It certainly can't be any worse.
> >
> I'm not sure that even Alien Apocalypse was worse.
That the one with Bruce Campbell and what's her name from Xena?
Then, no, Bewitched was worse.
--
Jitterbug phones:
Fourth one is in hand. Doesn't work. Yet. :(
|
